Publication: Falsedad ideológica en el ámbito tributario: evolución y dogmática
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017-01-20
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El acto de amor más importante de Dios que se produce con ocasión de la creación del mundo, es el hombre, el cual no actúa como un sirviente de los designios de Dios, si no que el objetivo perseguido es el establecimiento de las relaciones de amor entre ambas partes, pero siempre desde el ejercicio de la libertad individual más absoluta, sin ninguna clase de condicionantes, actuando en la toma de decisiones con total libertad de albedrío, este libre albedrío no presupone en ningún momento una actuación recta y adecuada a los mandatos divinos, o en otros términos que siempre se actúe mediante conductas beneficiosas tendentes a la búsqueda del bien, pues en ocasiones y más de las deseables, conlleva que el hombre en aquellas situaciones que se le propiciasen durante su vida, no actúe bondadosamente, si no que puede actuar hacia el mal. Esta libertad hace que pueda germinar la semilla del mal, y dejarse cegar por la mentira. El hombre que disfrutaba de una vida plena en el paraíso terrenal siempre que no perturbara el orden divino establecido, en el que gozaba de una autonomía de libertad absoluta en la que se deleitaba en toda clase de complacencias menos una que el propio Dios le había prohibido, el no tomar manzana alguna del árbol circunscrito, pero Adán fue seducido por su compañera Eva que había sido inducida por la serpiente demoniaca y probaron del mismo, Dios enterado de la tropelía llevada a cabo por ambos, les impuso la pena de expulsión del paraíso. La figura del engaño como instrumento para la consecución de un beneficio propio se encuentra ínsita en la vida cotidiana desde nuestros primeros padres; punto de partida de conductas que posteriormente se han sucedido a lo largo de la historia acomodándose en la realidad social; la reiteración del comportamiento mendaz ha sido determinante para que el ordenamiento jurídico tome posicionamiento frente al mismo...
The act of love of God more important that occurs on the occasion of the creation of the world, is the man, which does not act as a servant of the designs of God, if not that the objective is the establishment of relations of love between the two parties, but always from the exercise of individual freedom more absolute, without any kind of constraints, acting in the decision-making with absolutely freedom of choice, this free will does not presuppose in no time a straight and adequate action to the divine commands, or in other terms that are always operates by beneficial behaviours aimed at the search of the asset, because at times and most of the desirable. It implies that the man in those situations it could happen through during his life, not acting kindly, if not that you can act toward evil. This freedom makes might germinate the seed of evil, and blinded by lies. The man who enjoyed a full life in the earthly paradise provided that does not disrupt the divine order established, when he enjoyed an autonomy of absolute freedom in the that is revealed in all kinds of less a complacency that God himself had been forbidden to him, he does not take any of the apple tree circumscribed, but Adam was seduced by his companion Eva that had been induced by the serpent demon and tested the same. God heard the outrage carried out by the spouses, imposed on them the penalty of expulsion from Paradise. The recurrent utilisation of the lie, understood always “in general terms” like “the statement that issues whose contained does not correspond to the reality” and that write in a document to have fit in the juridical traffic, is what the juridical legislations have treated to give protection through the repression of the documentary counterfeit in his ideological slope. However, this penal protection along the times has had his lights and his shadows, as although from the primes of the first juridical texts the figure has had his backrest, is true that in some occasions the letters of the legislative text happens on tiptoe on the figure and does not pronounce on the same, what does not want to say, that the behaviours did not accompany to the social reality of the moment, only has had reflection in the imaginary social...
The act of love of God more important that occurs on the occasion of the creation of the world, is the man, which does not act as a servant of the designs of God, if not that the objective is the establishment of relations of love between the two parties, but always from the exercise of individual freedom more absolute, without any kind of constraints, acting in the decision-making with absolutely freedom of choice, this free will does not presuppose in no time a straight and adequate action to the divine commands, or in other terms that are always operates by beneficial behaviours aimed at the search of the asset, because at times and most of the desirable. It implies that the man in those situations it could happen through during his life, not acting kindly, if not that you can act toward evil. This freedom makes might germinate the seed of evil, and blinded by lies. The man who enjoyed a full life in the earthly paradise provided that does not disrupt the divine order established, when he enjoyed an autonomy of absolute freedom in the that is revealed in all kinds of less a complacency that God himself had been forbidden to him, he does not take any of the apple tree circumscribed, but Adam was seduced by his companion Eva that had been induced by the serpent demon and tested the same. God heard the outrage carried out by the spouses, imposed on them the penalty of expulsion from Paradise. The recurrent utilisation of the lie, understood always “in general terms” like “the statement that issues whose contained does not correspond to the reality” and that write in a document to have fit in the juridical traffic, is what the juridical legislations have treated to give protection through the repression of the documentary counterfeit in his ideological slope. However, this penal protection along the times has had his lights and his shadows, as although from the primes of the first juridical texts the figure has had his backrest, is true that in some occasions the letters of the legislative text happens on tiptoe on the figure and does not pronounce on the same, what does not want to say, that the behaviours did not accompany to the social reality of the moment, only has had reflection in the imaginary social...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Derecho, Departamento de Derecho Penal, leída el 01-02-2016