Publication: Poder, desarrollo y producción social del espacio desde el estado nación: la dialéctica centro-periferia en la neocolonización de los territorios aislados. El caso de la región de Aysén (Patagonia chilena)
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017-04-25
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El paradigma de la modernidad, y sus grandes relatos ideológicos, científicos y sociales que intentaron dar sentido a la historia, comienza a debilitarse en el contexto de una sociedad tecno-industrial que promueve la expansión de la racionalidad económica como lógica central de su funcionamiento. A lo largo de este proceso se han comenzado a estandarizar las formas de producción, los mercados, la cultura y los modos de vida más allá de los cambios estructurales internos de las sociedades nacionales. En esta etapa -que determinados autores1 describen como una radicalización de la modernidad ciertas características de la sociedad industrial relacionadas con la producción masiva de bienes, se manifiestan social y políticamente problemáticas, experimentándose la transición a un periodo en el cual se legitiman los riesgos que acompañan a dicha producción. Esta fase autonomizada, acumulativa y no percibida, enfrenta las bases de la modernización con sus propias consecuencias (Beck, 2001). Así, el consenso socioinstitucional sobre las ideas de progreso, desarrollo y orden (estabilización) como fines de la modernidad, si bien están asociados a conceptos positivos – bienestar, libertad, igualdad de derechos, entre otros - generan a su vez las propias condiciones de su desorden (inestabilidad) – destrucción ecológica, precariedad laboral, conflictos armados, crisis financieras, por citar algunos-...
The paradigm of modernity and its main ideological, scientists and social narratives that attempted to give meaning to history, begins to weaken in the context of a techno-industrial society that promotes the expansion of economic rationality as its essential logic function. Throughout this process, forms of production, markets, culture and ways of life have begun to standardize beyond the internal structural changes of national societies. At this stage -that some authors2 describe as a radicalization of modernity- certain features of industrial society related to mass production of goods, are socially and politically problematic, experiencing the transition to a period in which the risks that accompany such production are legitimized. This independent, cumulative and not perceived phase, confronts the bases of the modernization with their own consequences (Beck, 2001). Thus, while the socio-institutional consensus on the idea of progress, development and order (stabilization) as purposes of modernity are associated with positive concepts -welfare, freedom, equal rights, among others– in turn they generate their own conditions of disorder (instability) -ecological destruction, job insecurity, armed conflict or financial crisis, just to name a few. In this scenario, specific territories are beginning to be classified as 'marginalized' because they resist the productive adjustments -and narrative changes, in its transcultural forms - derived from the capitalist logic of the global market, that on behalf of efficiency, development and integration promotes a constant geographical distribution of industrial activity and a greater exploitation of nature through scale economies...
The paradigm of modernity and its main ideological, scientists and social narratives that attempted to give meaning to history, begins to weaken in the context of a techno-industrial society that promotes the expansion of economic rationality as its essential logic function. Throughout this process, forms of production, markets, culture and ways of life have begun to standardize beyond the internal structural changes of national societies. At this stage -that some authors2 describe as a radicalization of modernity- certain features of industrial society related to mass production of goods, are socially and politically problematic, experiencing the transition to a period in which the risks that accompany such production are legitimized. This independent, cumulative and not perceived phase, confronts the bases of the modernization with their own consequences (Beck, 2001). Thus, while the socio-institutional consensus on the idea of progress, development and order (stabilization) as purposes of modernity are associated with positive concepts -welfare, freedom, equal rights, among others– in turn they generate their own conditions of disorder (instability) -ecological destruction, job insecurity, armed conflict or financial crisis, just to name a few. In this scenario, specific territories are beginning to be classified as 'marginalized' because they resist the productive adjustments -and narrative changes, in its transcultural forms - derived from the capitalist logic of the global market, that on behalf of efficiency, development and integration promotes a constant geographical distribution of industrial activity and a greater exploitation of nature through scale economies...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias de la Información, Sección Departamental de Sociología IV (Métodos de la Investigación y Teoría de la Comunicación), leída el 25/11/2015