Publication: El derecho de rectificación o respuesta: integrante del derecho a la información y a la comunicación. Abordaje jurídico-comunicacional. Su aplicación comparada en el derecho español y argentino
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017-04-25
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El derecho de rectificación o respuesta integra el amplio contenido del derecho a la información y a la comunicación, vigorizando el diálogo público y fortaleciendo la democracia. Su estudio requiere un abordaje jurídico-comunicacional que tenga en cuenta su estatus legal y su proyección en la información, permitiendo escuchar otra versión de los hechos. Este instituto posee una histórica raigambre en la normativa europea, y en particular se abordará el caso de España, con una perspectiva de derecho comparado. Podemos preguntarnos si es útil, adecuado y pertinente comparar dos sistemas jurídicos que en principio son tan diferentes como el español y el argentino, que, de movida, pertenecen a dos continentes distintos y tienen trayectorias normativas muy disímiles desde su forma de gobierno, una con monarquía parlamentaria y la otra como república federal. Y la respuesta, es positiva, sí es posible, en principio por las contribuciones históricas del derecho indiano y español en las colonias del Río de la Plata, y en las huellas de pensamiento indelebles del derecho continental europeo que presenta la legislación civil y comercial argentina, las fuentes de derecho comparado español presentes en las sentencias que se analizan en el presente trabajo y en los fundamentos de los proyectos de ley sobre el derecho de rectificación o respuesta que consideran y retoman la experiencia y la normativa española. A diferencia del Convenio de Roma de 1950, el sistema interamericano de derechos humanos, posee una consagración específica del derecho de rectificación o respuesta en el artículo 14 de la Convención Americana de Derechos Humanos..
The right of reply is content of the wide right of information and communication, encouraging the public dialogue and strengthening the democracy. The study and the investigation about the right of reply requires the consideration of its legal status and the meaning for the communication, allowing listen others versions of the facts. This right has historical antecedents and tradition in the European regulation, and particularly this investigation will try the Spanish case, with a comparative law perspective. In this context, the interrogation may be if it is helpful, suitable and relevant compare two normative systems that by principle are totally different like the cases of Spain and Argentina, considering that at first they belong to different continents and they have normative trajectories with its own characters and their forms of government are in the case of Spain is a parliamentary monarchy and Argentina is a federal republic. And the answer is positive, yes, is possible compare both systems considering the historical contributions of the Indian and Spanish law in the colonies of the River Plate and the indelible traces of the European continental law that presents the civil and commercial argentine law, and the sources of comparative Spanish law that are in the jurisprudence, sentences and in the foundations of the bills about the reply right that considers, have in consideration and returns to the contributions of the Spanish Law. So, this right has historical antecedents in Spain and in the American system of human rights it is established in the article 14 of the American Convention of Human Rights. This is a remarkable contrast with the Rome Convention of 1950...
The right of reply is content of the wide right of information and communication, encouraging the public dialogue and strengthening the democracy. The study and the investigation about the right of reply requires the consideration of its legal status and the meaning for the communication, allowing listen others versions of the facts. This right has historical antecedents and tradition in the European regulation, and particularly this investigation will try the Spanish case, with a comparative law perspective. In this context, the interrogation may be if it is helpful, suitable and relevant compare two normative systems that by principle are totally different like the cases of Spain and Argentina, considering that at first they belong to different continents and they have normative trajectories with its own characters and their forms of government are in the case of Spain is a parliamentary monarchy and Argentina is a federal republic. And the answer is positive, yes, is possible compare both systems considering the historical contributions of the Indian and Spanish law in the colonies of the River Plate and the indelible traces of the European continental law that presents the civil and commercial argentine law, and the sources of comparative Spanish law that are in the jurisprudence, sentences and in the foundations of the bills about the reply right that considers, have in consideration and returns to the contributions of the Spanish Law. So, this right has historical antecedents in Spain and in the American system of human rights it is established in the article 14 of the American Convention of Human Rights. This is a remarkable contrast with the Rome Convention of 1950...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias de la Información, leída el 03/02/2016