Publication: Reglas de enfrentamiento y gobierno del Campo de Agramante
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017-06-15
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Las Reglas de Enfrentamiento (ROE) son aquellas órdenes dictadas a unidades militares para establecer las circunstancias, condiciones, grado y forma en que los combatientes están autorizados a usar la fuerza. El principal objetivo de esta tesis es investigar su naturaleza. Este concepto, contemporáneo y postmoderno, funciona como el definidor y regulador del metafórico “Campo de Agramante”, en tanto que crea el “espacio del conflicto y de la batalla”, que tiene naturaleza operacional, física, mental, legal y ética también. Cuando usamos esta expresión, nos referimos al ámbito específico en que las unidades militares en campaña intentan alcanzar sus objetivos, bajo el fuego, en medio del caos, la niebla y el fragor de la batalla. Evoca el espacio mental de Fauconnier, los dominios de cognición que permanecen “detrás de la escena”, un mundo de “posibles representaciones”, creadas por nuestros sentidos, conocimientos previos e ideología individual. El Campo de Agramante, como constructo, está relacionado con otros dos conceptos: la biosfera y la teoría de los mundos posibles. El primero, de acuerdo con la definición de Suess y Vernadsky, el sistema ecológico único que comprende todo tipo de vida del planeta. El Campo de Agramante sería el sistema ecológico único que comprende todo el conjunto formado por los distintos elementos que se comunican y chocan entre sí durante un combate, desde escenarios hasta actores y comportamientos. Podría ser una especie de ecosistema militar global, formado por una gran gama de organismos y especies, estados, organizaciones internacionales, ONGs, unidades militares, soldados, mercenarios, hackers, personal civil, etc. Por otro lado, cuando hablamos de mundos posibles, nos referimos a imaginarias o reales ámbitos-areas-formas-espacios-momentos donde podemos real o imaginariamente entrar durante un combate...
The Rules of Engagement (ROE) are orders issued to military units for establishing the circumstances, conditions, degree and manner in which combatants are allowed to use force. The main aim of this thesis is to investigate its nature. This contemporary and postmodern concept works as a definer and a regulator of the metaphoric “Agramante´s Field”, since it creates the “space of the conflict and the battle”. It has operational, physical, mental, legal and ethical nature. When we use this expression, we are referring to the specific ambit where military units in campaign try to manage their goals, under fire, in the chaos, the fog, the roar and the heat of the battle. It evokes Fauconnier “mental space”, the domains of cognition that remain “behind the scenes”; a “world of possible representations” created by our senses, previous knowledge and individual ideology. “Agramante´s Field”, as a construct, is connected to other concepts: the biosphere and the possible-worlds theory as well. The first one, according to Suess and Vernadsky´s definition, is the unique ecologic system which encompasses all planetary kind of life. “Agramante´s Field” would be the unique ecologic system which encompasses the whole set formed by elements wich communicates and collide with each other during a combat, from sceneries till actors and behaviors. It would be a kind of “global military ecosystem” formed by a very wide range of organisms and species, states, international organizations, NGO, military units, soldiers, mercenaries, hackers, civil personnel, and so on. Furthermore, when we talk about possible-worlds, we are referring to imagined o real ambits-areas-forms-spaces-moments where we can actually or potentially go into during a combat...
The Rules of Engagement (ROE) are orders issued to military units for establishing the circumstances, conditions, degree and manner in which combatants are allowed to use force. The main aim of this thesis is to investigate its nature. This contemporary and postmodern concept works as a definer and a regulator of the metaphoric “Agramante´s Field”, since it creates the “space of the conflict and the battle”. It has operational, physical, mental, legal and ethical nature. When we use this expression, we are referring to the specific ambit where military units in campaign try to manage their goals, under fire, in the chaos, the fog, the roar and the heat of the battle. It evokes Fauconnier “mental space”, the domains of cognition that remain “behind the scenes”; a “world of possible representations” created by our senses, previous knowledge and individual ideology. “Agramante´s Field”, as a construct, is connected to other concepts: the biosphere and the possible-worlds theory as well. The first one, according to Suess and Vernadsky´s definition, is the unique ecologic system which encompasses all planetary kind of life. “Agramante´s Field” would be the unique ecologic system which encompasses the whole set formed by elements wich communicates and collide with each other during a combat, from sceneries till actors and behaviors. It would be a kind of “global military ecosystem” formed by a very wide range of organisms and species, states, international organizations, NGO, military units, soldiers, mercenaries, hackers, civil personnel, and so on. Furthermore, when we talk about possible-worlds, we are referring to imagined o real ambits-areas-forms-spaces-moments where we can actually or potentially go into during a combat...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, leída el 23/06/2016