Publication:
Subsidies or loans? Evaluating the impact of R&D support programmes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017-09
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
The objective of this study is to compare the effect of different types of public direct support for R&D projects on firms’ technological capabilities. We distinguish between low-interest loans and national and European subsidies. Using data on 4,407 Spanish firms during the period 2002-2005, we estimate a multivariate probit to analyse the determinants of firms’ participation in public R&D programmes and, later, the impact of this participation on firms’ R&D activities using two different procedures. Regardless of the methodology employed for the analysis, the results suggest that being awarded any type of direct aid clearly increases the probability of conducting R&D activities. In terms of being supported through a unique instrument, the greatest effect corresponds to the case of European grants, where the impact is more than three times larger than the one of loans. As for R&D intensity, the hypothesis of full crowding-out of private R&D is rejected for all types of support. In addition, we find that the impacts of subsidies and loans reinforce each other when they are jointly awarded to SMEs. However, for large firms we cannot rule out the existence of crowding-out effect be-tween subsidies and loans.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Aerts, K., D. Czarnitzki and A. Fier (2006), “Evaluación econométrica de la política pública de I+D: estado del arte,” in Heijs and Buesa (eds.): La cooperación en innovación en España, el papel del estado. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, España. Ali-Yrkkö, J. (2005), “Impact of public R&D financing on private R&D. Does financial constraint matter?” Working Paper No. 30. ENEPRI, Brussels. Aristei, D., A. Sterlacchini and F. Venturini (2015), “The effects of public supports on business R&D: firm-level evidence across EU countries”, MPRA Paper No. 64611, University Library of Munich, Germany. Arvanitis, S. and H. Hollenstein (1994), “Demand and supply factors in explaining the innovative activity of Swiss manufacturing firms,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 3, 15-30. Audretsch, D. (1995), Innovation and Industry Evolution, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Barajas, A. and E. Huergo (2010), “International R&D cooperation within the EU Framework Programme: empirical evidence for Spanish firms,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(1–2), 87–111. Barajas, A., E. Huergo and L. Moreno (2016), “SME performance and public support for international RJVs,” Journal of Small Business Management, 54(4), 1206–1228. Bayona-Sáez, C. and T. García-Marco (2010), “Assessing the effectiveness of the Eureka program,” Research Policy, 39, 1375–1386. Becker, B. (2015), “Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917-942. Beneito, P. (2003), “Choosing among alternative technological strategies: An empirical analysis of formal sources of innovation,” Research Policy, 32, 693-713. Benfratello, L. and A. Sembenelli (2002), “Research joint ventures and firm-level performance,” Research Policy, 31, 493-507. Blanes, J. V. and I. Busom (2004), “Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms,” Research Policy, 33(10), 1459-1476. Busom, I. (2000), “An empirical evaluation of the effects of R&D subsidies,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 9(2), 111-148. Busom, I., M. B. Corchuelo and E. Martínez-Ros (2014), “Tax incentives... or subsidies for business R&D?” Small Business Economics, 43(3), 571-96. Busom, I., M. B. Corchuelo and E. Martínez-Ros (2016), “Participation inertia in R&D tax incentive and subsidy programs,” Small Business Economics, forthcoming. DOI:10.1007/s11187-016-9770-5. Busom, I. and A. Fernández-Ribas (2007), “Do R&D Programs of different government levels overlap in the European Union?” Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Atlanta Conference, 1-5. Cappellari, L. and S.P. Jenkins (2003), “Multivariate probit regression using simulated maximum likelihood,” The Stata Journal, 3(3), 278-294. Cassiman B. and R. Veugelers (2002), “R&D Cooperation and Spillovers: Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium,” American Economic Review, 92(4), 1169-1184. Cerulli, G. and B. Potì (2012), “Evaluating the robustness of the effect of public subsidies on a firm’s R&D: An application to Italy”, Journal of Applied Economics, 15(2), 287-320. Clausen, T. H. (2008), “Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovations activities at the firm level?” TIK Working papers on Innovation Studies No. 20070615. Oslo. Czarnitzki, D. and G. Licht (2006), “Additionality of Public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern Germany,” The Economics of Transition, 14(1), 101-131. Czarnitzki D., B. Ebersberger and A. Fier (2007), “The relationship between R&D Collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(7), 1347-1366. Czarnitzki, D. and C. Lopes-Bento (2014), “Innovation subsidies: Does the funding source matter for innovation intensity and performance? Empirical evidence from Germany,” Industry and Innovation, 21(5), 380-409. David, P.A., Hall B. H. and A. A. Toole (2000), “Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence,” Research Policy, 29, 497–529. Duguet, E. (2004), “Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D? Evidence from France using propensity score methods for non-experimental data,” Revue d’Economie Politique, 114(2), 263-292. European Commission (2003), SMEs in Europe 2003. The European Observatory for SMEs. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. European Commission (2009), Analysing and Evaluating the Impact on Innovation of Publicly Funded Research Programmes: Lot 2 – Benchmarking Strategies and Methodologies of National, European and International R&D Programmes to Assess and Increase their Impact on Innovation, Final Report, European Commission, DG Enterprise. García, A. and P. Mohnen (2010), “Impact of government support on R&D and innovation,” UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 2010-034, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology. Gerfin, M. and M. Lechner (2002), “A microeconometric evaluation of active labour market policy in Switzerland”, Economic Journal, 112, 845-893. González, X., Jaumandreu, J. and C. Pazó (2005), “Barriers to innovation and subsidy effectiveness,” The Rand Journal of Economics, 36(4), 930-949. González, X. and C. Pazó (2008), “Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?” Research Policy, 37(3), 371-389. Griffith, R., E. Huergo, J. Mairesse and B. Peters (2006), “Innovation and productivity across four European countries,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(4), 483-498. Guo, S. and M. W. Fraser (2010), Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications, SAGE publications, Inc. Hall, B. H. (2002), “The financing of research and development,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 35-51. Hall, B. and J. Lerner (2010), “The Financing of R&D and Innovation,” Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1, 609–639. Hall, B., Lotti, F. and J. Mairesse (2009), “Innovation and productivity in SMEs. Empirical evidence for Italy,” Small Business Economics, 33, 13-33. Heckman, J. J. (1979), “Sample selection bias as a specification error,” Econometrica, 47, 153–162. Heijs, J. (2005), “Identification of firms supported by technology policies: the case of Spanish low interest credits,” Science and Public Policy, 32(3), 219-230. Heijs, J. (2011), Mini Country Report/SPAIN, Thematic Report 2011 under Specific Contract for the Integration of INNO Policy Trend Chart with ERAWATCH (2011-2012), http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/innovation/files/countryreports/spain_en.pdf. Hernán, R., Marín, P. and G. Siotis (2003), “An empirical evaluation of the determinants of research joint venture formation,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 51(1), 75–89. Hottenrott, H. and C. Lopes-Bento (2014), “(International) R&D collaboration and SMEs: The effectiveness of targeted public R&D support schemes,” Research Policy, 41, 1055-1066. Huergo, E. and J. Jaumandreu (2004), “Firms’ age, process innovation and productivity growth,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 22, 541– 559. Huergo, E. and L. Moreno (2011), “Does history matter for the relationship between R&D, innovation and productivity?” Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(5), 1335–1368. Huergo, E. and M. Trenado (2010), “The Application for and the Awarding of Low-Interest Credits to Finance R&D Projects,” Review of Industrial Organization, 37(3), 237-259. Huergo, E., Trenado, M. and A. Ubierna (2016), “The impact of public support on firm propensity to engage in R&D: Spanish experience,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 206-219. Kaiser, U. and J. M. Kuhn (2012), “Long-run effects of public-private joint ventures: The case of the Danish Innovation Consortia support scheme,” Research Policy, 41, 913-927. Klepper, S. (1996), “Entry, exit, and innovation over the product life-cycle,” American Economic Review, 86, 562-583. Lach, S. (2002), “Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D? Evidence from Israel,” Journal of Industrial Economics 50(4), 369-390. Lerner, J. (2002), “When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: the design of effective ‘public venture capital’ programmes,” The Economic Journal, 112(477), F73-F84. Leuven, E. and B. Sianesi (2003), “PSMATCH”: “Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing,” Statistical Software Components S432001, Boston College Department of economics. Liu, R. and C. Rammer (2016), “The contribution of different public innovation funding programs to SMEs’ export performance”, ZEW Discussion Paper No. 16-078. ZEW (Centre for European Economic Research), Mannheim, Germany. OECD (2006), Government R&D funding and company behaviour. Measuring behavioural additionality. OECD report. OECD (2010), Measuring Innovation: A New Perspective. OECD Publishing. OECD (2012), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012, OECD Publishing. OECD (2015), Compendium of R&D tax incentive schemes: OECD countries and selected economies, 2015, www.oecd.org/sti/rd-tax-stats.htm. Ortega-Argilés, R., R. Moreno and J. Suriñach-Caralt (2005), “Ownership structure and innovation: Is there a real link?” The Annals of Regional Science, 39(4), 637-662. Piva, M. and M. Vivarelli (2009), “The role of skills as a major driver of corporate R&D,” International Journal of Manpower, 30(8), 835-852. Takalo, T., Tanayama, T. and O. Toivanen (2013), “Estimating the benefits of targeted R&D subsidies,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(1), 255-272. Wallsten, S.J. (2000), “The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program,” The Rand Journal of Economics, 31(1), 82-100. Zúñiga-Vicente, J.A., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J. and J. I. Galán (2014), “Assessing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: a survey,” Journal of Economics Surveys, 28(1), 36-67.
Collections