Publication: ¿Reprimarización en la periferia?: El caso brasileño (2003-2013)
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales (ICEI)
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El propósito de esta investigación es adentrarnos en la discusión sobre el significado de la desindustrialización, entendiendo que este fenómeno se puede manifestar de distintas formas dependiendo de dos factores: el primero, relacionado con el grado de desarrollo general e industrial de una economía; y el segundo, asociado a la abundancia/dependencia de uno o una pequeña cesta de productos primarios. Por otra parte, asumiendo que la economía brasileña lleva experimentando un proceso de desindustrialización dependiente desde finales de los años ochenta y, sobre todo, mediados de los noventa; nos centramos en constatar si en el periodo comprendido entre 2003 y 2013 se ha producido un proceso de reprimarización, interpretando este fenómeno como una vertiente de la llamada enfermedad holandesa. La metodología empírica aplicada está basada en el análisis de datos organizados en tablas y figuras. La conclusión principal, anticipada aquí, es que hay pocos indicios que apuntan a que Brasil ha experimentado durante el periodo de estudio un proceso de reprimarización de su estructura productiva.
The purpose of this research is to get into the discussion about the meaning of deindustrialization, understanding that this phenomenon can manifest itself in different ways depending on two factors: the first related to the level of general and industrial development in an economy; and second, associated with the abundance / dependence on one or a small basket of commodities. Moreover, assuming that the Brazilian economy has been undergoing a process of dependent industrialization since the late eighties and, above all, the mid-nineties; we focus on finding if in the period between 2003 and 2013 there has been a process of reprimarization, interpreting this phenomenon as a branch of the so-called Dutch disease. The empirical methodology is based on analysis of data organized in tables and figures. The main conclusion, anticipated here, is that there is little evidence that Brazil has experienced during the period of study a process of reprimarization of its productive structure.
The purpose of this research is to get into the discussion about the meaning of deindustrialization, understanding that this phenomenon can manifest itself in different ways depending on two factors: the first related to the level of general and industrial development in an economy; and second, associated with the abundance / dependence on one or a small basket of commodities. Moreover, assuming that the Brazilian economy has been undergoing a process of dependent industrialization since the late eighties and, above all, the mid-nineties; we focus on finding if in the period between 2003 and 2013 there has been a process of reprimarization, interpreting this phenomenon as a branch of the so-called Dutch disease. The empirical methodology is based on analysis of data organized in tables and figures. The main conclusion, anticipated here, is that there is little evidence that Brazil has experienced during the period of study a process of reprimarization of its productive structure.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Álvarez, N. (2009): Ajustes y salarios. Las consecuencias del neoliberalismo en América Latina y Estados Unidos, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Madrid.
Alves, C., Aparecida, S., y Lemes, K. (2008): “O Sentido da Reprimarização da Pauta Exportadora: uma interpretação à luz de Celso Furtado”, Caio Prado Jr. e Francisco de Oliveira, SOBER.
Arrighi, G., Hopkins, T., y Wallerstein, I. (1999): Movimientos Antisistémicos, Akal, Madrid.
Arrighi, G., Silver, B., y Brewer, B. (2003): “Industrial Convergence, Globalization, and the Persistence of the North-South Divide”, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 38, n. º 1, pp. 3-31.
Arrighi, G., y Drangel, J. (1986): “The Stratification of the World-Economy: An Exploration of the Semiperipherial Zone”, Review, vol. 10, n. º 1, pp.9-74.
Baumol, W. (1967): “Macroeconomics of unbalanced growth: The anatomy of urban crisis”, The American Economic Review, vol. 57, n. º 3, pp. 415-426.
Baumol, W. (2000): “Services as leaders & the leader of the services. Inaugural lecture”, International Conference on the Economics & Socio-Economics of Services, junio 22-23, Lille.
Baumol, W., y. Bowen, W. (1966): Performing Arts, The Economic Dilemma: a study of problems common to theater, opera, music, and dance, Twentieth Century Fund, New York.
Begué, A. (2001): El Papel Económico del Estado y las Políticas de Privatización en el Brasil de los Años Noventa, Tesis Doctoral, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, UCM, Madrid.
Bruno, M., y J. Sachs. (1982): “Energy and resource allocation: a dynamic model of the Dutch disease”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 49, n. º 5.
Buiter, W., y D. Purvis, Oil. (1980): “Disinflation, and export competitiveness: a model of the Dutch disease”, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Working Paper Series, n. º 5592.
Cano, W. (2007): “Raízes da Concentração Industrial em São Paulo”, Ed. IE/Unicamp.
Carcanholo, M. (2010): “Inserção externa e vulnerabilidade da Economia brasileira no governo Lula”, Garamond, pp. 109-131.
Carcanholo, M. (2014): “Desafios e Perspectivas para a América Latina do Século XXI”, Argumentum, vol. 6, n. º 2, pp. 6-24.
Clark, C, (1940): The conditions of economic progress, Mcmillan, London.
Cohen, S., y Zysman, J. (1987): Manufacturing Matters: The Myth of the PostIndustrial Economy, Basic Books, New York.
Corden, W., y Neary, J. (1982): “Booming sector and de-industrialisation in a small open economy”, Economic Journal, vol. 92, pp. 825-84.
Dasgupta, S., y Singh, A. (2006): “Manufacturing, services and premature deindustrialization in developing countries – a Kaldorian analysis”, World Institute for Development Economics Research, n. º 49.
Davis, G. (1995): “Learning to Love the Dutch Disease: Evidence from the Mineral Economies”, World Development, vol. 23, n. º 10, pp. 1765-1779.
Evans, P. (1979): Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational, State, and Local Capital in Brazil, Princeton University Press.
Fajnzylber, F. (1983): La industrialización trunca de América Latina, Nueva Imagen, México.
Fajnzylber, F., y Martínez, T. (1976): Las empresas trasnacionales. Expansión a nivel mundial y proyección en la industria mexicana, Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.
Ferreira, D., y Cutrim, A. (2011): “Desindustrialização e reprimarização da economia brasileira contemporânea num contexto de crise financeira global: conceitos e evidencias”, Revista Economia Ensaios, vol. 26, n. º 1, pp. 35-64.
Fontagné, L., y Lorenzi, J. (2005): Désindustrialisation, délocalisations, Conseil d’Analyse Économique, Paris.
Forbes, 11 de abril de 1983, pp. 146-149.
Gonçalves, R. (2011): “Nacional-desenvolvimentismo às Avessas”, IPEA, N. º4.
Grigera, J. (2011): “La desindustrialización en Argentina. ¿Agresión a la manufactura o reestructuración capitalista?”, Ediciones Continente, pp. 81-101, Buenos Aires.
Grigera, J. (2012): “El concepto de desindustrialización como peculiaridad argentina”, Revista de Estudios Marítimos y Sociales, n. º 5/6, Mar del Plata.
Gylfason, T., y Nguessa, J. (2014): “Diversification, Dutch Disease, and Economic Growth: Options for Uganda”, Center of Economic Estudies & Ifo Institute Working Paper, n. º 5095.
IBGE. Pesquisa Industrial Anual – Empresa. In: Série Relatórios Metodológicos do IBGE, vol. 26, 2004.
Kaldor, N. (1966): Causes of the Slow Rate of Growth in the UK. Cambridge University Press, London.
Kaldor, N. (1967): Problems of industrialization in underdeveloped countries. Strategic Factors of Economic Development, Cornell University Press, New York.
Kohli, A. (2004): State-Directed Development. Political Power and Industrialization in the Global Periphery, Cambridge University Press.
Maroto, A. (2013): “Las relaciones entre servicios y productividad: Un tema a impulsar en el ámbito regional y territorial”, Investigaciones Regionales, n. º 27, pp. 157-183, Madrid.
Márquez, L., y Pradilla, E. (2008): “Desindustrialización, terciarización y estructura metropolitana: un debate conceptual necesario”, Tercera Época, n. º 69, pp. 21-45.
Martínez, J, (2010): “La estructura teórica Centro/Periferia y el análisis del Sistema Económico Global: ¿obsoleta o necesaria?”, Reunión Internacional de Economía Mundial.
Medialdea, B. (2009): Subdesarrollo, Capital Extranjero y Financiarización: La Trampa Financiera de la Economía Brasileña, Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid.
Messenberg, R. (2012): “Desindustrialização no Brasil: Apontamentos para um Debate em Favor do Desenvolvimento Econômico”, Ipea Conjuntura em Foco, n. º 18.
Nadal, A. (2009): “La reprimarización de América Latina”, La Jornada, 07/10/2009.
O’Donnel, G. (1977): Apuntes para una teoría del Estado, Cedes, Buenos Aires.
Palma, G. (2005): “Quatro fontes de desindustrialização e um novo conceito de doença holandesa”, Conferência de industrialização, desindustrialização e desenvolvimento, FIIESP.
Pasinetti, L. (1981): Cambio estructural y crecimiento económico. Pirámide, Madrid.
Paz, M. (2014): “Oil and development in Brazil: Between an extractive and an industrialization strategy”, Energy Policy, n. º 73, pp. 505-511, Madrid.
Pereira, D. (2012): “A desindustrialização em marcha no Brasil: uma análise comparada”, XVII Encontro Nacional de Economia Política - ENEP/SEP, vol.1, pp. 1-22, Rio de Janeiro.
Pereira, D. (2015): Desindustrialização e Estruturas Produtivas Regionais no Brasil, Tesis Doctoral, Instituto de Economia da Universidade Estadual, Campinas. Puga, F. (2006): “Por que crescem as exportações”, BNDES, n. º 1, Brasília.
Ramírez, J. (2014): “Has Bolivia's 2006–12 gas policy been useful to combat the resource curse?”, Resources Policy, n. º 41, pp. 113-123.
Ros, J. (2011): “How to neutralize the adverse developmental effects of the Dutch Disease”, New Developmentalism and a Structuralist Development Macroeconomics, San Pablo.
Ross, M., (1999): “The political economy of the resource curse”, World Politi, n. º 51, pp. 297-322.
Rowthorn, R., y Rawaswamy, R. (1997): “Deindustrialization: Causes and Implications”, IMF working paper, n. º WP/97/42, Oxford.
Rowthorn, R., y Rawaswamy, R. (1998): “Growth trade and deindustrialization”, IMF working paper, n. º WP/98/60, Oxford.
Sachs, J. y Warner, A. (2001): “The curse of natural resources”, European Economic Review, n. º 45.
Sachs, J., y Warner, A. (1995): “Natural resource abundance and economic growth”, National Bureau of Economic Research Working paper, n. º 5398, Cambridge.
Salama, P. (2012): “China-Brasil: Industrialización y ‘Desindustrialización Temprana’”, Cuadernos de Economía, vol. 31, n. º 56, pp. 223-252, Bogotá.
Silva, J. (2014): “En torno a la discusión sobre ‘desindustrialización’”. Un sucinto análisis respecto a la producción bruta y el producto interior bruto. Tendencias, vol. 15, n. º 1, pp. 109-130, Nariño.
Slipak, A. (2014): “La expansión de China en América Latina: incidencia en los vínculos comerciales argentino-brasileños”, Congreso de Economía Política Internacional, Moreno.
Slipak, A., y Bolinaga, L. (2015): “El Consenso de Beijing y la reprimarización productiva de América Latina: el caso argentino”, Problemas del Desarrollo, vol. 46, n. º 183, pp.33-58, México D.F.
Sotelo, A. (2004): Desindustrialización y crisis del neoliberalismo, Plaza y Valdés, México D.F.
Taïeb, E., y Barros, O. (1989): Économie et société brésiliennes, Nathan, Paris.
The Economist, The Dutch disease, The Economist, 26 de noviembre, 1977, pp. 82-83.