Publication:
Utility of Bruch membrane opening-based optic nerve head parameters in myopic subjects

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2018-01-01
Authors
Sastre Ibáñez, Marina
Martínez de la Casa, Jose Maria
Rebolleda Fernández, Gema
Cifuentes Canorea, Pilar
Moreno, María Nieves
Morales Fernández, Laura
Sáenz Francés, Federico
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sage Publications
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether the new rim analysis software with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) shows advantages over the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in patients with moderate myopia. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, we studied 65 healthy subjects, 37 with spherical refractive errors in the range of -3 to -6 D (moderate, G1) and 28 with less than -3 D (low/non-myopic, G0). All patients were examined with Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT, including Glaucoma Premium Module Edition (GPME) software. With GPME, we analyzed the neuroretinal rim (Bruch membrane opening-minimum rim width [BMO-MRW]) and RNFL. Results: The average age of subjects was 30.2 ± 9.3 years for G0 and 29.9 ± 7.1 years for G1 (p = 0.903). Mean sphere was −0.5 ± 0.3 D (-1.25 to 0 D) G0 and -3.9 ± 0.3 D (-6.00 to -3 D) G1 (p<0.001). The RNFL thickness comparison between G0 and G1 showed a significantly lower thickness in G1 (p = 0.018). The BMO-MRW measurements were similar in both groups (p = 0.331). With the BMO-MRW examination, the number of sectors classified as pathologic per subject in G1 were significantly lower compared to RNFL analysis (p = 0.023). Conclusions: Ring analysis based on BMO-MRW measurements shows a lower rate of false-positives compared to RNFL thickness when studying healthy moderate myopic eyes and it would be advisable to take this into consideration when analyzing these patients.
Description
Article first published online: November 8, 2017; Issue published: January 1, 2018 Received: July 09, 2017; Accepted: August 11, 2017
Keywords
Citation
Collections