Publication: Impugnación del recurso de casación del Ministerio Fiscal contra la sentencia del "caso guateque". La ilicitud en el conocimiento de la "notitia criminis" y su propagación al inicio y a los actos de investigación.
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2018-02-14
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El presente Trabajo Final de Máster tiene por objeto la realización de un escrito de impugnación del Recurso de Casación presentado ante el Tribunal Supremo por el Ministerio Fiscal frente a la Sentencia 6239/2017, Sección 2ª, de 19 de junio, de la Audiencia Provincial de Madrid, en la que se juzgó la macro causa conocida como ‘Caso Guateque’, en la que estuvieron implicadas 30 personas acusadas de varios delitos de cohecho, de prevaricación ambiental, de negociaciones prohibidas a funcionarios y delitos contra el Patrimonio histórico, a través del cual es posible entender cuáles son los requisitos que establece la ley procesal que han de darse para que puedan ser tenidas como válidas en un juicio las diferentes pruebas aportadas por las partes, en concreto, en este caso, se pone de manifiesto la importancia de la cadena de custodia de la prueba más importante de la causa, una grabación de una conversación que ponía de manifiesto la comisión de los delitos anteriormente indicados.
The purpose of this Final Master's Thesis is to make a written challenge to the Appeal of Cassation submitted by the Public Prosecutor to the Supreme Court against the Sentence 6239/2017, Section 2, of June 19, of the Provincial Appellate Court Madrid. This Sentence refers to the macro case also known as the ‘Guateque Case’; during of which, 30 people were accused of several crimes of bribery, environmental trespass, negotiations forbidden to officials and crimes against the Historical Heritage. Through this case it becomes clear to understand which are the requirements established in the procedural law so that the evidences provided by the parties can be considered valid. Concretely in this case, the chain of custody reveals itself as a key part of the whole case; especially when it is about the most important evidence of the trial, as it is a recorded conversation that reveals the commission of the crimes which I exposed before.
The purpose of this Final Master's Thesis is to make a written challenge to the Appeal of Cassation submitted by the Public Prosecutor to the Supreme Court against the Sentence 6239/2017, Section 2, of June 19, of the Provincial Appellate Court Madrid. This Sentence refers to the macro case also known as the ‘Guateque Case’; during of which, 30 people were accused of several crimes of bribery, environmental trespass, negotiations forbidden to officials and crimes against the Historical Heritage. Through this case it becomes clear to understand which are the requirements established in the procedural law so that the evidences provided by the parties can be considered valid. Concretely in this case, the chain of custody reveals itself as a key part of the whole case; especially when it is about the most important evidence of the trial, as it is a recorded conversation that reveals the commission of the crimes which I exposed before.
Description
Calificación: Matrícula de Honor (10)