Publication: Modelo de evaluación de política criminológica basado en los derechos humanos y su aplicación al caso mexicano
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2018-05-09
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La evaluación de las políticas públicas es un fenómeno reciente; este proceso de es tan importante como la formulación e implementación de las mismas. La política criminológica, desde los años setentas ha basado sus líneas de acción en ideologías populistas y politizadas lejos de la evaluación; carece desde hace ya más de 4 décadas de procesos sistematizados de evaluación los cuales deberían constituir su praxis cotidiana. Es por ello que surge la necesidad de diseñar un modelo de evaluación de las políticas criminológicas para poder estar así en condiciones de analizar las acciones llevadas a cabo por un gobierno relacionadas con la prevención y el tratamiento del crimen y de los sujetos antisociales. Los derechos humanos son un aspecto fundamental a considerar cuando se analizan las políticas relacionadas con el sistema de justicia penal, toda vez que el estado tiende a disminuir su observancia cuando se llevan a cabo medidas privativas de libertad. Objetivo: El objetivo de la investigación reside en diseñar un modelo de evaluación de las políticas criminológicas penales basado en la observancia2 de los derechos humanos, el cual funcione como un mecanismo estandarizado para comparar los diferentes sistemas de intervención penal a nivel internacional...
Public policy evaluation is a recent phenomenon; this procedure is as important as the formulation and implementation of policies. Since the seventies, criminal policy has based its actions on populist and politicized ideologies apart from evaluation; more than four decades of lack of systematized evaluation processes, which should constitute its daily praxis. Because of this, the need of designing a criminal policy evaluation model arises, in order to be able to analyse government actions related to prevention and crime and criminals treatment. Human rights are essential when considering criminal justice policies, since nations tend to decrease their observance when imprisonment is performed. Objective: The main purpose of the research is to design a criminal policy evaluation model based on human rights observance that works as a standardized mechanism to internationally compare different penal intervention systems. A pragmatic evaluation is proposed as the best way to value and analyse the oversight of human rights of the state criminal practices. Feinstein sets out that such evaluation includes freedom to choose the best methods: “The pragmatic public policies evaluation is not restricted to the use of just one method or approach: it rejects methodological fundamentalism, searching for the adequate method for the circumstances, with the proper rigor. It is also pragmatic since emphasizes the use of evaluation without taking it for granted and adopting an active paper to promote the dissemination and application of public policy evaluations”...
Public policy evaluation is a recent phenomenon; this procedure is as important as the formulation and implementation of policies. Since the seventies, criminal policy has based its actions on populist and politicized ideologies apart from evaluation; more than four decades of lack of systematized evaluation processes, which should constitute its daily praxis. Because of this, the need of designing a criminal policy evaluation model arises, in order to be able to analyse government actions related to prevention and crime and criminals treatment. Human rights are essential when considering criminal justice policies, since nations tend to decrease their observance when imprisonment is performed. Objective: The main purpose of the research is to design a criminal policy evaluation model based on human rights observance that works as a standardized mechanism to internationally compare different penal intervention systems. A pragmatic evaluation is proposed as the best way to value and analyse the oversight of human rights of the state criminal practices. Feinstein sets out that such evaluation includes freedom to choose the best methods: “The pragmatic public policies evaluation is not restricted to the use of just one method or approach: it rejects methodological fundamentalism, searching for the adequate method for the circumstances, with the proper rigor. It is also pragmatic since emphasizes the use of evaluation without taking it for granted and adopting an active paper to promote the dissemination and application of public policy evaluations”...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, leída el 30/05/2017