Publication: Los periodistas frente al poder político: discurso periodístico de valoración negativa de los políticos en Costa Rica (2011-2015)
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2018-06-01
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La investigación “LOS PERIODISTAS FRENTE AL PODER POLÍTICO. Discurso periodístico de valoración negativa de los políticos en Costa Rica (2011-2015)” es una tesis sobre discurso periodístico. Específicamente sobre el discurso periodístico de valoración negativa de las personas con responsabilidad política. Una investigación interesada por el propósito y estrategias de ese discurso. Se inscribe en el modelo metodológico interpretativista, en la medida en que busca comprender el fenómeno que la ocupa sin aspirar a encontrar las causas explicativas de este. Consecuentemente, el marco teórico y metodológico se mantiene en el ámbito del construccionismo social, y con una metodología básicamente cualitativa. Las técnicas metodológicas empleadas son el análisis de discurso (manual) y, de forma complementaria, para triangular resultados, la entrevista en profundidad. Dichos análisis, que ocupan la mayor parte del trabajo empírico realizado, se enmarcan en el campo de los estudios críticos del discurso, específicamente con base en las aportaciones teóricas de Teun van Dijk. Adicionalmente, considerando que el que interesa es también un discurso de valoración, se integran los aportes de la Teoría de la Valoración de James R. Martin y Peter R. White, complemento muy adecuado para trabajar en los textos algunas categorías centrales del ACD. La entrevista en profundidad mertoniana, por último, es utilizada como otra “ventana”, más íntima y flexible, para asomarse a las diferentes percepciones e interpretaciones que los distintos actores, básicamente periodistas y políticos, tienen de su compleja relación...
The research entitled “JOURNALISTS AND POLITICAL POWER -Journalistic discourse of negative appraisal of politicians in Costa Rica (2011-2015)-” is a thesis on journalistic discourse, specifically that of negative appraisal of individuals with political responsibility. This research is concerned with the purpose and strategies of such journalistic discourse. It fits into the interpretive model, as it aims to understand the phenomenon under research, without intending to find the explanatory causes of it. Consequently, the theoretical and methodological framework falls within the scope of social constructionism, using a mainly qualitative methodology. The methodological techniques used are discourse analysis (manual) and focused interview; the latter is used complementarily to triangulate results. Most of the empirical work conducted is based on those analyses, which are framed within critical discourse studies, specifically, the theoretical contributions of Teun van Dijk. Additionally, in line with appraisal discourse studies, the contributions of James R. Martin and Peter R. White’s Appraisal Theory are included as a very appropriate complement to operationalize some central Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) categories. Finally, Merton’s focused interview is used as another more intimate and flexible “window” to view the different perceptions and interpretations that different actors, mainly journalists and politicians, have about their complex relationship...
The research entitled “JOURNALISTS AND POLITICAL POWER -Journalistic discourse of negative appraisal of politicians in Costa Rica (2011-2015)-” is a thesis on journalistic discourse, specifically that of negative appraisal of individuals with political responsibility. This research is concerned with the purpose and strategies of such journalistic discourse. It fits into the interpretive model, as it aims to understand the phenomenon under research, without intending to find the explanatory causes of it. Consequently, the theoretical and methodological framework falls within the scope of social constructionism, using a mainly qualitative methodology. The methodological techniques used are discourse analysis (manual) and focused interview; the latter is used complementarily to triangulate results. Most of the empirical work conducted is based on those analyses, which are framed within critical discourse studies, specifically, the theoretical contributions of Teun van Dijk. Additionally, in line with appraisal discourse studies, the contributions of James R. Martin and Peter R. White’s Appraisal Theory are included as a very appropriate complement to operationalize some central Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) categories. Finally, Merton’s focused interview is used as another more intimate and flexible “window” to view the different perceptions and interpretations that different actors, mainly journalists and politicians, have about their complex relationship...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias de la Información, leída el 18-04-2017