Publication: Gestión de colecciones digitales con esquemas de catalogación reconfigurables
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2018-10-26
Authors
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Agradezco el apoyo recibido durante estos años por parte de todos los miembros de mi grupo de investigación ILSA en la Facultad de Informática de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. También a los grupos de investigación LEETHI y LOEP pertenecientes también a la Universidad Complutense, y a la Fundación El Caño de Panamá, sin los que no habría podido realizar parte de los experimentos expuestos en los trabajos.A título personal, deseo agradecer a mis directores José Luis Sierra, Ana Fernández-Pampillón, Antonio Sarasa, y compañeros de grupo de investigación Alfredo Fernández Valmayor, Daniel Rodríguez, Bryan Temprado y César Ruiz por darme la oportunidad de desarrollar estos años de investigación con ellos sobre este campo, esfuerzo que concluye en esta tesis, y por todo lo que me han enseñado sobre cómo ser un buen investigador.Dentro de la universidad también deseo dar las gracias a mis compañeros del “Aula16”: Toni, Dan, Iván, Víctor, Jesús, Pablo, Cristina y Marta con los que he compartido muchas comidas, y cafés, a lo largo de estos años divagando sobre informática. También quiero dar las gracias a mis actuales compañeros del “420bip”: Susana, Vicky, Carlos y Noelia, que me han visto dando los últimos remates estos meses a esta tesis y me han ayudado en todo lo que han podido...
The cataloging scheme of a digital collection serves to adequately catalog (describe and classify) the objects that comprise it. Such cataloging is essential to enabling the effective exploitation of the collection, both by the collection management system (digital repository), and by the external tools used for retrieving, reproducing and adding objects. Indeed, basic functionalities such as the retrieval of resources from queries, or guided navigation, all depend on the proper cataloging of resources.In this way, in the domain of digital libraries, several standards have been proposed for the cataloging of digital objects, whose ultimate purpose is to guarantee interoperability among the different repositories and applications that manipulate the objects. However, the adoption of pre-established cataloging schemata may not be a satisfactory solution in those scenarios where cataloging schemata, instead of being established a priori, are artifacts that change and evolve throughout the entire collection’s life cycle (the rationality of this evolving nature is to adapt to changing cataloging requirements and needs, which are not known at the beginning of the collection, but appear and mature as the collection grows and evolves). We realized this fact during our collaboration with different humanities groups in different domains (archeology, conventional literature, digital literature, creative writing, etc.). From these experiences we learned that the inductive definition of cataloging schemata (i.e., the concurrent evolution of schemata and collections), far from being an exception, is the norm for the production of very specific collections, often oriented to research and teaching...
The cataloging scheme of a digital collection serves to adequately catalog (describe and classify) the objects that comprise it. Such cataloging is essential to enabling the effective exploitation of the collection, both by the collection management system (digital repository), and by the external tools used for retrieving, reproducing and adding objects. Indeed, basic functionalities such as the retrieval of resources from queries, or guided navigation, all depend on the proper cataloging of resources.In this way, in the domain of digital libraries, several standards have been proposed for the cataloging of digital objects, whose ultimate purpose is to guarantee interoperability among the different repositories and applications that manipulate the objects. However, the adoption of pre-established cataloging schemata may not be a satisfactory solution in those scenarios where cataloging schemata, instead of being established a priori, are artifacts that change and evolve throughout the entire collection’s life cycle (the rationality of this evolving nature is to adapt to changing cataloging requirements and needs, which are not known at the beginning of the collection, but appear and mature as the collection grows and evolves). We realized this fact during our collaboration with different humanities groups in different domains (archeology, conventional literature, digital literature, creative writing, etc.). From these experiences we learned that the inductive definition of cataloging schemata (i.e., the concurrent evolution of schemata and collections), far from being an exception, is the norm for the production of very specific collections, often oriented to research and teaching...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Informática, Departamento de Ingeniería del Software e Inteligencia Artificial, leída el 30-06-2017