Publication: Intervención en medio abierto con personas sin hogar desde las entidades sociales de la ciudad de Madrid
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2018-09
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La presente investigación analiza los modelos subyacentes a las principales actuaciones con Personas sin Hogar en medio abierto realizadas por las entidades sociales de la ciudad de Madrid. Para ello se propone una metodología de articulación en la complementación de diferentes técnicas cuantitativas y cualitativas, entre las que destacan la entrevista en profundidad y el análisis de datos secundarios. Los resultados muestran dos enfoques de intervención diferenciados y enfrentados: uno Asistencialista, mayoritario, y otro Inclusivo, minoritario. Asimismo, destaca la conflictividad generada en calle a raíz de las actuaciones descoordinadas, espontaneas y no informadas de reparto indiscriminado.
This research analyzes the underlying models to the main actions in open environment made by the social entities with homeless people in the city of Madrid. For this purpose, an articulation complementation methodology of different quantitative and qualitative techniques is proposed, among which stand out in-depth interview and the analysis of secondary data. The results display two differentiated and confronted intervention approaches with homeless people: an Assistance model, predominant, and another Inclusive model, in a minority. Likewise, it is particularly worthy of mention the generated conflict in the street because of the uncoordinated, spontaneous and uninformed actions of indiscriminate distribution.
This research analyzes the underlying models to the main actions in open environment made by the social entities with homeless people in the city of Madrid. For this purpose, an articulation complementation methodology of different quantitative and qualitative techniques is proposed, among which stand out in-depth interview and the analysis of secondary data. The results display two differentiated and confronted intervention approaches with homeless people: an Assistance model, predominant, and another Inclusive model, in a minority. Likewise, it is particularly worthy of mention the generated conflict in the street because of the uncoordinated, spontaneous and uninformed actions of indiscriminate distribution.