Publication: Debate ontoepistémico entre Newton y Leibniz: solapamiento y tangencialidad
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2019-02-15
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Las nociones teóricas de «solapamiento» y «tangencialidad», que introducimos en este trabajo, son las que articulan nuestra investigación, consistente en un estudio contrastivo de las teorías de Leibniz y Newton en el ámbito de la física. En el curso de ella, intentaremos mostrar las diferencias ontológicas y epistémicas que separan las doctrinas de uno y otro autor, partiendo de la base de que esos dos órdenes —el epistémico y el ontológico— están íntimamente relacionados en sus respectivos sistemas. De ahí que la metodología adoptada deba considerarse una «perspectiva ontoepistémica».El concepto de solapamiento lo definimos como el fenómeno que se produce en el seno de un sistema ideológico cuando dos de sus planos o, en sentido amplio, elementos constitutivos resultan incompatibles entre sí —desde las propias premisas del sistema—, lo que los incomunica y bloquea el tránsito entre ellos, comprometiendo así la noción misma de sistema. La tangencialidad queda definida como el fenómeno inverso, es decir, el que se produce en el seno de un sistema ideológico cuando todos sus planos o, en sentido amplio, elementos constitutivos resultan compatibles entre sí —desde las propias premisas del sistema—, compatibilidad que franquea la comunicación entre ellos y garantiza la solidez conceptual del sistema en su conjunto...
The theoretical notions of “overlapping” and “tangentiality”, which we introduce in this work, articulate our investigation, consisting of a comparative study between the theories put forward by Leibniz and Newton in the field of physics. It is our intention during this study to show the ontological and epistemic difference which separate the doctrines of these authors, taking into account that the two orders —epistemic and ontological— are intimately related in their systems. Hence, the methodology adopted should be considered as following an ontoepistemic perspective.The concept of overlapping can be defined as the phenomenon taking place within an ideological system where two of its parts or, in a broader sense, constituent elements, are mutually incompatible —according to the very premises of the system—. This prevents communication and flow between them, and, in turn, compromises the very notion of system. The tangentiality is the phenomenon which occurs within an ideological system where all of its parts or, in a broader sense, constituent elements, are mutually compatible —according to the very premises of the system—. This compatibility enables communication between those parts and ensures the conceptual soundness of the system as a whole...
The theoretical notions of “overlapping” and “tangentiality”, which we introduce in this work, articulate our investigation, consisting of a comparative study between the theories put forward by Leibniz and Newton in the field of physics. It is our intention during this study to show the ontological and epistemic difference which separate the doctrines of these authors, taking into account that the two orders —epistemic and ontological— are intimately related in their systems. Hence, the methodology adopted should be considered as following an ontoepistemic perspective.The concept of overlapping can be defined as the phenomenon taking place within an ideological system where two of its parts or, in a broader sense, constituent elements, are mutually incompatible —according to the very premises of the system—. This prevents communication and flow between them, and, in turn, compromises the very notion of system. The tangentiality is the phenomenon which occurs within an ideological system where all of its parts or, in a broader sense, constituent elements, are mutually compatible —according to the very premises of the system—. This compatibility enables communication between those parts and ensures the conceptual soundness of the system as a whole...
Description
Tesis de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía, leída el 05/12/2018