Publication:
CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: Evidence from the Trans-Pacific Partnership

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2019
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales. Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico (ICAE)
Citations
Google Scholar
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Journal Issue
Abstract
The paper investigates the role of consumption of both renewable and sustainable energy, as well as alternative and nuclear energy, in mitigating the effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, based on the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). The papers introduces a novel variable to capture trade openness, which appears to be a crucial factor in inter-regional co-operation and development, in order to evaluate its effect on the environment, The empirical analysis is based on a sample of nine signatories to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) for the period 1971-2014, which is based on data availability. The empirical analysis is based on several time series econometric methods, such as the cointegration test, two long run estimators, namely the fully modified ordinary least squares (FMOLS) and dynamic ordinary least squares (DOLS) methods, as well as the Granger causality test. There are several noteworthy empirical findings: it is possible to confirm the U-shaped EKC hypothesis for six countries, namely Australia, Canada, Chile, New Zealand, Peru and Vietnam; there is no evidence of the EKC for Mexico; a reverse-shaped EKC is observed for Japan and Malaysia, there are long run relationships among the variables, the adoption of either renewable energy, or alternative energy and nuclear energy, mitigates CO2 emissions, trade openness leads to more beneficial than harmful impacts in the long run, the Granger causality tests show more bi-directional-relationships between the variables in the long run, and the Granger causality tests show more uni-directional-relationships between the variables in the short run.
Description
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1. Ben Jebli, M., Belloumi, M., Investigation of the causal relationships between combustible renewables and waste consumption and CO2 emissions in the case of Tunisian maritime and rail transport, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 71, 820–829. 2. Apergis, N., Payne, J.E., Menyah, K., Wolde-Rufael, Y., On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth, Ecoogical. Economics, 2010, 69, 2255–2260. 3. Raza, S.A., Shah, N., Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in G7 countries: the role of renewable energy consumption and trade, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25, 26965–26977. 4. Adebola Solarin, S., Al-Mulali, U., Ozturk, I., Validating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in India and China: The role of hydroelectricity consumption, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 80, 1578–1587. 5. Dogan, E., The relationship between economic growth and electricity consumption from renewable and non-renewable sources: A study of Turkey, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 52, 534–546. 6. Dogan, E., Analyzing the linkage between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth by considering structural break in time-series data, Renewable Energy, 2016, 99, 1126–1136. 7. Dogan, E., Ozturk, I., The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24, 10846–10854. 8. Dogan, E., Seker, F., The influence of real output, renewable and non-renewable energy, trade and financial development on carbon emissions in the top renewable energy countries, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2016, 60, 1074–1085. 9. Dogan, E., Turkekul, B., CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: Testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2016, 23, 1203–1213. 10. Dogan, E., Seker, F., Determinants of CO2emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy, Renewable Energy, 2016, 94, 429–439. 11. Shahzad, S.J.H., Kumar, R.R., Zakaria, M., Hurr, M., Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: A revisit, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 70, 185–192. 12. Shahbaz, M., Hoang, T.H. Van, Mahalik, M.K., Roubaud, D., Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis, Energy Economics, 2017, 63, 199–212. 13. Menyah, K., Wolde-Rufael, Y., CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US, Energy Policy, 2010, 38, 2911–2915. 14. Dong, K., Sun, R., Jiang, H., Zeng, X., CO2 emissions, economic growth, and the environmental Kuznets curve in China: What roles can nuclear energy and renewable energy play?, Jornal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 196, 51–63. 15. Iwata, H., Okada, K., Samreth, S., Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2in France: The role of nuclear energy, Energy Policy, 2010, 38, 4057–4063. 16. Ali, W., Abdullah, A., Azam, M., The dynamic relationship between structural change and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: A cointegrating approach, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2017, 24, 12723–12739. 17. Sharif, A., Raza, S.A., Ozturk, I., Afshan, S., The dynamic relationship of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption with carbon emission: A global study with the application of heterogeneous panel estimations, Renewable Energy, 2018. 18. Dong, K., Hochman, G., Zhang, Y., Sun, R., Li, H., Liao, H., CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: Empirical evidence across regions, Energy Economics, 2018, 75, 180–192. 19. Zoundi, Z., CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 72, 1067–1075. 20. Pata, U.K., Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks, Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 187, 770–779. 21. Pata, U.K., The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2emissions: Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey, Energy, 2018, 160, 1115–1123. 22. Sugiawan, Y., Managi, S., The environmental Kuznets curve in Indonesia: Exploring the potential of renewable energy, Energy Policy, 2016, 98, 187–198. 23. Jalil, A., Mahmud, S.F., Environment Kuznets curve for CO2emissions: A cointegration analysis for China, Energy Policy, 2009, 37, 5167–5172. 24. Jayanthakumaran, K., Liu, Y., Openness and the Environmental Kuznets Curve: Evidence from China, Econonomic Modeling, 2012, 29, 566–576. 25. Shahbaz, M., Loganathan, N., Zeshan, M., Zaman, K., Does renewable energy consumption add in economic growth? An application of auto-regressive distributed lag model in Pakistan, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 44, 576–585. 26. Saboori, B., Sulaiman, J., CO2emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries: A cointegration approach, Energy, 2013, 55, 813–822. 27. Gill, A.R., Viswanathan, K.K., Hassan, S., A test of environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) for carbon emission and potential of renewable energy to reduce green house gases (GHG) in Malaysia, Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2018, 20, 1103–1114. 28. Tang, C.F., Tan, B.W., The impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam, Energy, 2015, 79, 447–454. 29. Al-Mulali, U., Saboori, B., Ozturk, I., Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam, Energy Policy, 2015, 76, 123–131. 30. Copeland, B.R., Taylor, M.S., Trade, growth, and the environment, Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, 42, 7–71. 31. Antweiler, W., Copeland, B.R., Scott Taylor, M., Is free trade good for the environment?, American Economic Review, 2001, 887–908. 32. Shahbaz, M., Nasreen, S., Ahmed, K., Hammoudeh, S., Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels, Energy Economics, 2017, 61, 221–232. 33. Zaidi, S.A.H. Danish, Hou, F., Mirza, F.M., The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in CO2 emissions: A disaggregate analysis of Pakistan, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25(31), 31616–31629. 34. Chandran, V.G.R., Tang, C.F., The impacts of transport energy consumption, foreign direct investment and income on CO2emissions in ASEAN-5 economies., Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 24, 445–453. 35. Engle, R.F., Granger, C.W.J., Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing, Econometrica, 1987, 55, 251–276. 36. Johansen, S., Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1988, 12, 231–254. 37. Johansen, S., Juselius, K., Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration – with applications to the demand for money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and.Statistics, 1990, 2, 170–209. 38. MacKinnon, J.G., Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1996, 11, 601–618. 39. Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., Distribution of the estimators for autoregresive time series witha a unit root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1979, 74, 427–431. 40. Phillips, P.C.B., Perron, P., Testing for a unit root in time series regression, Biometrika, 1988, 75, 335–346. 41. Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B., Schmidt, P., Shin, Y., Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root, Journal of Econometrics, 1992, 54, 159–178. 42. Gregory, A.W., Hansen, B.E., Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts, Journal of Econometrics, 1996, 70, 99–126. 43. Phillips, P.C.B., Hansen, B.E., Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes, Review of Economic Studies, 1990, 57, 99–125. 44. Stock, J.H., Watson, M.W., A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems, Econometria, 1993, 61, 783–820. 45. Zambrano-Monserrate, M.A., Silva-Zambrano, C.A., Davalos-Penafiel, J.L., ZambranoMonserrate, A., Ruano, M.A., Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Peru: The role of renewable electricity, petroleum and dry natural gas, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82, 4170–4178. 46. Ertugrul, H.M., Cetin, M., Seker, F., Dogan, E., The impact of trade openness on global carbon dioxide emissions: Evidence from the top ten emitters among developing countries, Ecological Indicators, 2016, 67, 543–555. 47. Warnick, C.T., Lazarus, H.M., The role of renewable energy to validate dynamic interaction between CO2 emissions and GDP towards sustainable development in Malaysia, Energy Economics, 2018, 453–457. 48. Cheung, Y.-W., Lai, K.S., Finite–sample sizes of Johansen’s likelihood ratio tests for cointegration, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and.Statistics, 1993, 55, 313–328. 49. Ahn, S.K., Reinsel, C.G., Estimation for partially nonstationary multivariate autoregressive models, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1990, 85, 813-823. 50. Reimers, H.E., Comparison of tests for multivariate cointegration, Statistical Papers, 1992, 33, 335-359.