Publication: Tratamiento restaurador en un paciente con anomalías estructurales del esmalte generalizadas
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2019
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Las lesiones de hipomineralización de esmalte suponen para los pacientes un problema de salud, función y estética debido a las consecuencias que ocasiona esta patología. Por ello, es importante realizar un plan de tratamiento individualizado además de una secuencia de revisiones y mantenimiento, ya que son dientes más débiles estructuralmente y con elevada susceptibilidad a la caries.
Se presenta el caso de una paciente con una afectación del esmalte generalizada donde se lleva a cabo un tratamiento restaurador para mejorar la función, empleando la tecnología digital mediante el uso de escáner intraoral; junto con la técnica de inyección de resinas fluidas, para mejorar la estética del sector anterior.
Enamel hypomineralization lesions involve a health, functional and aesthetic problem due to the consequences caused by this pathology. Therefore, it is important to perform an individualized treatment plan, along with a sequence of revisions and maintenance, because these teeth are structurally weaker and high susceptible to caries. The case of a patient with generalized enamel defect is reported, where a restorative treatment is realized to improve function, using digital technology through an intraoral scanner; plus the use of injectable resin composite to improve the aesthetic sector.
Enamel hypomineralization lesions involve a health, functional and aesthetic problem due to the consequences caused by this pathology. Therefore, it is important to perform an individualized treatment plan, along with a sequence of revisions and maintenance, because these teeth are structurally weaker and high susceptible to caries. The case of a patient with generalized enamel defect is reported, where a restorative treatment is realized to improve function, using digital technology through an intraoral scanner; plus the use of injectable resin composite to improve the aesthetic sector.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1. MSCBS. Agencia Española de Medicamentos y Productos Sanitarios. Disponible en: https://cima.aemps.es/cima/publico/home.html
2. American Society of Anesthesiologists. Standards and Guidelines: ASA Physical Status Classification System. ASA House of Delegates; October 15, 2014. Disponible en: https:// www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system
3. Armitage GC. Development of a classification system for periodontal diseases and conditions. Annals of Periodontol. 1999; 4(1): 1-6.
4. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, van Dyke TE y cols. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Condition. J Clin Periodontol. 2018; 45(20): 68-77.
5. Braga MM, Mendes FM, Ekstrand KR. Detection activity assessment and diagnosis of dental caries lesions. Dent Clin North Am. 2010; 54(3): 479-493.
6. Mateos Moreno MV, Llena Puy C, Garcillán Izquierdo MR, Bratos Calvo E. Protocolos para la actuación con niños con alto riesgo de caries en diferentes edades y situaciones. SESPO. 2013; 1-37.
7. Fradeani M. Análisis Estético. Un acercamiento sistemático al tratamiento protésico. Volumen 1. 1º Edición. Barcelona: Quintessence; 2006.
8. Mele M, Felice P, Sharma P, Mazzotti C, Bellone P, Zucchelli G. Esthetic treatment of altered passive eruption. Periodontol 2000. 2018; 77(1): 65-83.
9. Spear FM, Kokich VG, Mathews DP. Manejo interdisciplinario de la estética en el sector anterior. J.A.D.A. 2006; 137(2): 160-9.
10. Veneziani M. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: updated indications and the Morphology Driven Preparation Technique. Int J Esthet Dent. 2017; 12(2): 204-230.
11. Montagner AF, Sarkis-Onofre R, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. MMP inhibitors on Dentin stability: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Dent Res. 2014; 93(8): 733-743.
12. Magne P, Spreafico R. Deep margin elevation: A Paradigm Shift. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012; 2(2): 86–96.
13. Dietschi D, Olsburgh S, Krejci I, Davidson C. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation after occlusal stressing of indirect class II composite restorations with different resinous bases. Eur J Oral Sci. 2003; 111(1): 73–80.
14. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part I. Historical perspectives and clinical rationale for a biosubstitutive approach. Int J Esthet Dent. 2015; 10(2): 210-227.
15. Rocca GT, Rizcalla N, Krejci I, Dietschi D. Evidence-based concepts and procedures for bonded inlays and onlays. Part II. Guidelines for cavity preparation and restoration fabrication. Int J Esth Dent. 2015; 10(3): 392-413.
16. Ahlers M, Mörig G, Hajtó J, Pröbster L, Frankenberger R. Guidelines for the Preparation of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays and Partial Crowns. Int J Comput Dent. 2009; 12(4): 309-325.
17. Re D, Cerutti A, Mangani F, Putignano A. Restauraciones Esteticas-Adhesivas Indirectas Parciales en Sectores Posteriores. 1º Edición. Torino: Amolca; 2009.
18. Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Laganá DC, Sesma N. Patient outcomes and procedure working time for digital versus conventional impressions: A sistematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119(2): 214-219.
19. Chochlidakis K, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen C, Feng I, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2016; 116(2): 184-190.
20. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva N, Bonfante EA. A New Classification System for All-Ceramic and Ceramic-like Restorative Materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28(3): 227-235.
21. Morimoto S, Rebello de Sampaio FBW, Braga MM, Sesma N, Özcan M. Survival Rate of Resin and Ceramic Inlays, Onlays, and Overlays: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. J Dent Res. 2016; 95(9): 985-994.
22. Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, Pradelle N, Seux D, Grosgogeat B. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018; 119(3): 384-389.
23. D'Arcangelo C, Vanini L, Casinelli M, Frascaria M, De Angelis F, Vadini M, D’Amario M. Adhesive Cementation of Indirect Composite Inlays and Onlays: A Literature Review. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2015; 36(8): 570-577.
24. Barabanti N, Preti A, Vano M, Derchi G, Mangani F, Cerutti A. Indirect composite restorations luted with two different procedures: A ten years follow up clinical trial. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015; 7(1): 54-59.
25. Terry D. Restoring with flowables. 1º Edición. Batavia: Quintessence; 2019.
26. Terry D. Developing a Functional Composite Resin Provisional. Am J Esthet Dent. 2012; 2(1): 56–66.
27. Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable Resin Composites: A Systematic Review and Clinical Considerations. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(6): 18-24.
28. Sumino N, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Shiratsuchi K, Miyazaki M, Latta MA. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013; 71(3-4): 820-827.