The interplay of nested biotic interactions and the abiotic environment regulates populations of a hypersymbiont



Downloads per month over past year

Mestre, Alexandre and Poulin, Robert and Holt, Robert D. and Barfield, Michael and Clamp, John C. and Fernández Leborans, Gregorio and Mesquita-Joanes, Francesc (2019) The interplay of nested biotic interactions and the abiotic environment regulates populations of a hypersymbiont. Journal of Animal Ecology . pp. 1-13. ISSN 0021-8790, ESSN: 1365-2656

[thumbnail of Mestre_et_al.2019. the interplay of nested...(1).pdf] PDF
Restringido a Repository staff only


Official URL:


1.The role of biotic interactions in shaping the distribution and abundance of species should be particularly pronounced in symbionts. Indeed, symbionts have a dual niche composed of traits of their individual hosts and the abiotic environment external to the host, and often combine active dispersal at finer scales with host‐ mediated dispersal at broader scales. The biotic complexity in the determinants of species distribution and abundance should be even more pronounced for hypersymbionts (symbionts of other symbionts).
2.We use a chain of symbiosis to explore the relative influence of nested biotic interactions and the abiotic environment on occupancy and abundance of a hypersymbiont.
3.Our empirical system is the epibiont ciliate Lagenophrys discoidea, which attaches to an ostracod that is itself ectosymbiotic on crayfish (the basal host). We applied multimodel selection and variance partitioning for GLMM to assess the relative importance of (a) traits of symbiotic hosts (ostracod sex and abundance), (b) traits of basal hosts (crayfish body weight, abundance and intermoult stage), (c) the abiotic environment (water chemistry and climate) and (d) geospatial autocorrelation patterns (capturing potential effects of crayfish dispersal among localities).
4.Our models explained about half of the variation in prevalence and abundance of the hypersymbiont. Variation in prevalence was partly explained, in decreasing order of importance (18%–4%) by shared effects of symbiotic host traits and the abiotic environment, pure fixed effects of symbiotic hosts, abiotic environment and geospatial patterns (traits of basal hosts were not relevant). Hypersymbiont abundance was most strongly explained by random effects of host traits (mainly the symbiotic host), in addition to weaker fixed effects (mostly abiotic environment).
5.Our results highlight the major role of the interplay between abundance of symbiotic hosts and water physico‐chemistry in regulating populations of a hypersymbiotic ciliate, which is likely critical for dispersal dynamics, availability of attachment resources and suitability of on‐host living conditions for the ciliate. We also found moderate signal of regulation by the basal host, for which we propose three mechanisms: (a) modulation of microhabitat suitability (crayfish‐created water currents); (b) concentration of symbiotic hosts within crayfish; and (c) dispersal mediated by crayfish.

Item Type:Article
Uncontrolled Keywords:Abundance; Dispersal; Host traits; Nested hosts; Niche; Occupancy; Symbiotic host
Subjects:Medical sciences > Biology > Ecology
Medical sciences > Biology > Invertebrates
ID Code:57249
Deposited On:07 Oct 2019 15:08
Last Modified:08 Oct 2019 08:48

Origin of downloads

Repository Staff Only: item control page