Publication: Análisis comparativo in vitro de veracidad y precisión de la estereofotogrametría (PIC) y del escáner intraoral (Trios) en toma de registros para prótesis sobre implantes en arcada completa
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2019
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Gallucci G, Benic G, Eckert S, Papaspyridakos P, Schimmel M, Schrott A, et al. Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for Implant Loading Protocols. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2014 Jan;29(Supplement):287–90. Available from: http://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?iss2_id=1220&article_id=13469&articl e=19&title=Consensus Statements and Clinical Recommendations for Implant Loading Protocols#.VADlBkuRNZg 2. Katsoulis J, Takeichi T, Sol Gaviria A, Peter L, Katsoulis K. Misfit of implant prostheses and its impact on clinical outcomes. Definition, assessment and a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Oral Implantol [Internet]. 2017;10 Suppl 1(October):121–38. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28944373 3. Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR, Kan JYK, et al. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1999 Jan;81(1):7– 13. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022391399702295 4. Sahin S, Çehreli MC. The Significance Of Passive Framework Fit In Implant Prosthodontics: Current Status. Implant Dent [Internet]. 2001 Jun;10(2):85–92. Available from: https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00008505-200104000-00003 5. Andriessen FS, Rijkens DR, van der Meer WJ, Wismeijer DW. Applicability and accuracy of an intraoral scanner for scanning multiple implants in edentulous mandibles: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2014 Mar;111(3):186–94. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.07.010 6. Jemt T, Lie A. Accuracy of implant supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. Vol. 6, Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1995. p. 172–80. 7. Vandeweghe S, Vervack V, Dierens M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy of digital impressions of multiple dental implants: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(6):648–53. 8. Branemark P-I. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 1983 Sep;50(3):399–410. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=4152010&tool=pmcentrez&rend ertype=abstract 9. Karl M, Rösch S, Graef F, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. Strain situation after fixation of threeunit ceramic veneered implant superstructures. Implant Dent. 2005;14(2):157–65. 10. Flügge T, van der Meer WJ, Gonzalez BG, Vach K, Wismeijer D, Wang P. The accuracy of different dental impression techniques for implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 2018 Oct;29:374–92. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/clr.13273 11. Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6(3):270–6. 12. Watanabe F, Uno I, Hata Y, Neuendorff G, Kirsch A. Analysis of stress distribution in a screw-retained implant prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2000;15(2):209– 18. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10795453 13. Smedberg J-I, Nilner K, Rangert B, Svensson SA, Glantz P-O. On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: A methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 1996 Mar;7(1):55–63. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070107.x 14. Meer WJ Van Der, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of Intra-Oral Dental Scanners in the Digital Workflow of Implantology. 2012;7(8):1–8. 15. Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Gallucci G, Doukoudakis A, Weber H-P, Chronopoulos V. Accuracy of Implant Impressions for Partially and Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2014;29(4):836–45. Available from: http://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?iss2_id=1244&article_id=14584&articl e=9&title=Accuracy of Implant Impressions for Partially and Completely Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review#.U_9BX0uRNZg 16. Abduo J, Bennani V, Waddell N, Lyons K, Swain M. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2010;25(3):506–15. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20556249 17. Fukazawa S, Odaira C, Kondo H. Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res [Internet]. 2017;61(4):450–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2017.01.005 18. Wood MR, Vermilyea SG. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: Report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2004;92(5):447– 62. 19. Ciocca L, Meneghello R, Monaco C, Savio G, Scheda L, Gatto MR, et al. In vitro assessment of the accuracy of digital impressions prepared using a single system for full-arch restorations on implants. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg [Internet]. 2018;13(7):1097–108. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1719-5
20. Papaspyridakos P, Hirayama H, Chen C-J, Ho C-H, Chronopoulos V, Weber H-P. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 2016 Sep;27(9):1099–105. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/clr.12695 21. Karl M, Graef F, Schubinski P, Taylor T. Effect of intraoral scanning on the passivity of fit of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Quintessence Int [Internet]. 2012;43(7):555– 62. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22670250 22. Papaspyridakos P, Chen C-J, Chuang S-K, Weber H-P, Gallucci GO. A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2012;27(1):102–10. Available from: http://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/elink.fcgi?dbfrom=pubmed&id=22299086&retmo de=ref&cmd=prlinks%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/E740C93B-1961-4C10-AD14DBDB704748E5 23. Smedberg JI, Nilner K, Rangert B, Svensson SA, Glantz PO. On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: A methodological and clinical study. Vol. 7, Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1996. p. 55–63. 24. Giménez B, Pradíes G, Martínez-Rus F, Özcan M. Accuracy of Two Digital Implant Impression Systems Based on Confocal Microscopy with Variations in Customized Software and Clinical Parameters. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2015 Jan;30(1):56–64. Available from: http://quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?iss2_id=1276&article_id=15002&article=7&t itle=Accuracy of Two Digital Implant Impression Systems Based on Confocal Microscopy with Variations in Customized Software and Clinical Parameters#.V-lqQYWhxz8 25. Patzelt SBM, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2014 Jul 17;18(6):1687–94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24240949 26. Duret F, Blouin J-L, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;117(November):715–20. 27. Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics - Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Opt Lasers Eng [Internet]. 2014;54:203–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optlaseng.2013.07.017 28. Abdel-Azim T, Zandinejad A, Elathamna E, Lin W, Morton D. The Influence of Digital Fabrication Options on the Accuracy of Dental Implant–Based Single Units and CompleteArch Frameworks. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2014;29(6):1281–8. Available
from: http://quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?iss2_id=1263&article_id=14741 29. Ting-shu S, Jian S. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique: A Review. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(4):313–21. 30. Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry : a review of the current literature. 2017;1–11. 31. Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Caponi M, Governi L, Blois L. A Comparative Analysis Of Intraoral 3d Digital Scanners For Restorative Dentistry. Internet J Med Technol. 2012;5(1):1–18. 32. Park H-N, Lim Y-J, Yi W-J, Han J-S, Lee S-P. A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10(1):58. 33. Lin WS, Metz MJ, Pollini A, Ntounis A, Morton D. Digital data acquisition for a CAD/CAM-fabricated titanium framework and zirconium oxide restorations for an implantsupported fixed complete dental prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2014;112(6):1324–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.06.012 34. Pesce P, Pera F, Setti P, Menini M. Precision and Accuracy of a Digital Impression Scanner in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation. Int J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2018;31(2):171–5. Available from: http://quintpub.com/journals/ijp/abstract.php?iss2_id=1517&article_id=18219 35. Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(6):755–61. 36. Yuzbasioglu E, Kurt H, Turunc R, Bilir H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: Evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. BMC Oral Health [Internet]. 2014;14(1):1–7. Available from: BMC Oral Health 37. Gallardo YR, Bohner L, Tortamano P, Pigozzo MN, Laganá DC, Sesma N. Patient outcomes and procedure working time for digital versus conventional impressions: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2018;119(2):214–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.07.007 38. Wismeijer D, Mans R, van Genuchten M, Reijers HA. Patients’ preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 2014 Oct;25(10):1113–8. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/clr.12234 39. Joda T, Brägger U. Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures: a randomized crossover trial. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 2016
Dec;27(12):e185–9. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/clr.12600 40. Kattadiyil MT, Mursic Z, Alrumaih H, Goodacre CJ. Intraoral scanning of hard and soft tissues for partial removable dental prosthesis fabrication. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2014;112(3):444–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.03.022 41. Rodriguez JM, Bartlett DW. The dimensional stability of impression materials and its effect on in vitro tooth wear studies. Dent Mater [Internet]. 2011 Mar;27(3):253–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.010 42. Furze D, Byrne A, Donos N, Mardas N. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla. Quintessence Int (Berlin, Ger 1985) TA - TT -. 2012;43(2):127–34. 43. Lee SJ, Betensky RA, Gianneschi GE, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 2015 Jun;26(6):715–9. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/clr.12375 44. Christensen GJ. Will digital impressions eliminate the current problems with conventional impressions? J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 2008;139(6):761–3. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0258 45. Mühlemann S, Kraus RD, Hämmerle CHF, Thoma DS. Is the use of digital technologies for the fabrication of implant-supported reconstructions more efficient and/or more effective than conventional techniques: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(May):184–95. 46. Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: Influence of tray material, impression material, and time. J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2002 Jun;11(2):98–108. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1053/jopr.2002.125192 47. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 2013 Jan;24(1):111–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22353208 48. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J [Internet]. 2008 May 10;204(9):505–11. Available from: http://www.nature.com/articles/sj.bdj.2008.350 49. Zimmer S, Göhlich O, Rüttermann S, Lang H, Raab WH-M, Barthel CR. Long-term Survival of Cerec Restorations: A 10-year Study. Oper Dent [Internet]. 2008;33(5):484–7. Available from: http://www.jopdentonline.org/doi/abs/10.2341/07-142 50. Koch GK, Gallucci GO, Lee SJ. Accuracy in the digital workflow: From data acquisition to
the digitally milled cast. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2016;115(6):749–54. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.004 51. Patzelt SBM, Bishti S, Stampf S, Att W. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. J Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145(11):1133–40. 52. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation, and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(S1):e54– 64. 53. Chochlidakis KM, Papaspyridakos P, Geminiani A, Chen CJ, Feng IJ, Ercoli C. Digital versus conventional impressions for fixed prosthodontics: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2016;116(2):184-190.e12. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017 54. de França DGB, Morais MHST, das Neves FD, Barbosa GAS. Influence of CAD/CAM on the fit accuracy of implant-supported zirconia and cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2015 Jan;113(1):22–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.010 55. Abduo J. Fit of CAD/CAM Implant Frameworks: A Comprehensive Review. J Oral Implantol [Internet]. 2012 Sep 25;XL:141208072802005. Available from: http://www.joionline.org/doi/abs/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00117.1 56. Kapos T, Evans C. CAD/CAM Technology for Implant Abutments, Crowns, and Superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(Supplement):117–36. 57. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active triangulation technology with blue light for implants: Effect of clinically relevant parameters. Implant Dent. 2015;24(5):498–504. 58. Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-Arch dental impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2013;109(2):121–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1 59. Christensen GJ. Impressions Are Changing. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 2009 Oct;140(10):1301–4. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002817714645682 60. IGem. No Title [Internet]. [cited 2019 Jun 10]. Available from: http://2017.igem.org/Team:Aachen/Hardware 61. Patzelt SBM, Vonau S, Stampf S, Att W. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing
edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc [Internet]. 2013 Aug;144(8):914–20. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0002817714605110 62. Svanborg P, Skjerven H, Carlsson P, Eliasson A, Karlsson S, Örtorp A. Marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium fixed dental prostheses generated from digital and conventional impressions. Int J Dent. 2014;2014. 63. Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araújo É, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LCC, et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):515–23. 64. Zimmermann M, Koller C, Rumetsch M, Ender A, Mehl A. Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivoPräzision von Guided-ScanningVerfahren bei digitalen Gesamtkieferabformungen in vivo. J Orofac Orthop / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2017;78(6):466–71. 65. Flügge T V., Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop [Internet]. 2013 Sep;144(3):471–8. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0889540613005714 66. Ender A, Mehl A. In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions. Quintessence Int. 2015;46(1):9–17. 67. Contrepois M, Soenen A, Bartala M, Laviole O. Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2013;110(6):447-454.e10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.003 68. SHIM JS, LEE JS, LEE JY, CHOI YJ, SHIN SW, RYU JJ. Effect of software version and parameter settings on the marginal and internal adaptation of crowns fabricated with the CAD/CAM system. J Appl Oral Sci [Internet]. 2015 Oct;23(5):515–22. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S167877572015000500515&lng=en&tlng=en 69. Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2014;112(4):909–13. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.020 70. Fransson B, Øilo G, Gjeitanger R. The fit of metal-ceramic crowns, a clinical study. Dent Mater. 1985;1(5):197–9. 71. Ercoli C, Geminiani A, Feng C, Lee H. The Influence of Verification Jig on Framework Fit for Nonsegmented Fixed Implant-Supported. :188–95. 72. Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining
complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2016 Mar;115(3):313–20. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.09.011 73. Marghalani A, Weber H, Finkelman M, Kudara Y, El Rafie K, Papaspyridakos P. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2018 Apr;119(4):574–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022391317304924 74. Papaspyridakos P, Gallucci GO, Chen CJ, Hanssen S, Naert I, Vandenberghe B. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: Accuracy outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;27(4):465–72. 75. Moldovan O, Luthardt RG, Corcodel N, Rudolph H. Three-dimensional fit of CAD/CAMmade zirconia copings. Dent Mater [Internet]. 2011;27(12):1273–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.006 76. Flügge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. A Novel Method to Evaluate Precision of Optical Implant Impressions with Commercial Scan Bodies-An Experimental Approach. J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2017 Jan;26(1):34–41. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jopr.12362 77. Rudolph H, Salmen H, Moldan M, Kuhn K, Sichwardt V, Wöstmann B, et al. Accuracy of intraoral and extraoral digital data acquisition for dental restorations. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(1):85–94. 78. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(4):1201–8. 79. Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy EA, Seidt J, Johnston WM. Accuracy of different digital scanning techniques and scan bodies for complete-arch implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2019;1–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.01.003 80. Mizumoto RM, Yilmaz B. Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2018 Sep;120(3):343–52. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.029 81. Joda T, Wittneben JG, Brägger U. Digital implant impressions with the “Individualized Scanbody Technique” for emergence profile support. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(3):395–7. 82. Karl M, Palarie V. Variables Affecting the Accuracy of Implant Master Casts: An In Vitro Pilot Study. J Dent Surg. 2014;2014:1–6. 83. Ahlholm P, Sipila K, Vallittu P, Jakonen M, Kotiranta U. Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics : A Review. 2016;1–7. 84. Marghalani A, Weber HP, Finkelman M, Kudara Y, El Rafie K, Papaspyridakos P. Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: An evaluation of accuracy. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(4):574–9. 85. Lin W, Harris BT, Zandinejad A, Morton D. Use of digital data acquisition and CAD / CAM technology for the fabrication of a fixed complete dental prosthesis on dental implants. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2014;111(1):1–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.04.010 86. Amin S, Weber HP, Finkelman M, El Rafie K, Kudara Y, Papaspyridakos P. Digital vs. conventional full-arch implant impressions: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res [Internet]. 2016 Nov;28(11):1360–7. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/clr.12994 87. Güth J-F, Runkel C, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Edelhoff D, Keul C. Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization. Clin Oral Investig [Internet]. 2017;21(5):1445–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27406138 88. Di Fiore A, Meneghello R, Graiff L, Savio G, Vigolo P, Monaco C, et al. Full arch digital scanning systems performances for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a comparative study of 8 intraoral scanners. J Prosthodont Res [Internet]. 2019;2–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2019.04.002 89. Gimenez-Gonzalez B, Hassan B, Özcan M, Pradíes G. An In Vitro Study of Factors Influencing the Performance of Digital Intraoral Impressions Operating on Active Wavefront Sampling Technology with Multiple Implants in the Edentulous Maxilla. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(8):650–5. 90. Vecsei B, Joós-Kovács G, Borbély J, Hermann P. Comparison of the accuracy of direct and indirect three-dimensional digitizing processes for CAD/CAM systems – An in vitro study. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(2):177–84. 91. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Parallel Confocal Laser Technology for Implants with Consideration of Operator Experience and Implant Angulation and Depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2014;29(4):853–62. Available from: http://www.quintpub.com/journals/omi/abstract.php?iss2_id=1244&article_id=14586&articl e=11&title=Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Parallel Confocal Laser Technology for Implants with Consideration of Operator Experience and Implant Angulat 92. Flügge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners. Int J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2016;29(3):277–83. Available from:
96
http://quintpub.com/journals/ijp/abstract.php?iss2_id=1377&article_id=16299&article=15&t itle=Precision of Dental Implant Digitization Using Intraoral Scanners#.WLRk2fOhxz8 93. Rhee Y-K, Huh Y-H, Cho L-R, Park C-J. Comparison of intraoral scanning and conventional impression techniques using 3-dimensional superimposition. J Adv Prosthodont [Internet]. 2015;7(6):460. Available from: https://synapse.koreamed.org/DOIx.php?id=10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.460 94. Holst S, Persson A, Wichmann M, Karl M. Digitizing implant position locators on master casts: comparison of a noncontact scanner and a contact-probe scanner. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants [Internet]. 2012;27(1):29–35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22299075 95. Papaspyridakos P, Benic GI, Hogsett VL, White GS, Lal K, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: An optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):676–81. 96. Müller P, Ender A, Joda T. Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS Pod scanner. 2016;47(4):343–9. 97. Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit-an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(3):851– 6. 98. Nedelcu RG, Persson ASK. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: An in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2014;112(6):1461–71. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027 99. Örtorp A, Jemt T, Bäck T. Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: A comparative laboratory study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(1):43–50. 100. Bergin JM, Rubenstein JE, Mancl L, Brudvik JS, Raigrodski AJ. An in vitro comparison of photogrammetric and conventional complete-arch implant impression techniques. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2013 Oct;110(4):243–51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S00223913(13)60370-4 101. Rivara F, Lumetti S, Calciolari E, Toffoli A, Forlani G, Manfredi E. Photogrammetric method to measure the discrepancy between clinical and software-designed positions of implants. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2016 Jun;115(6):703–11. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.017 102. Pradíes G, Ferreiroa A, Özcan M, Giménez B, Martínez-Rus F. Using stereophotogrammetric technology for obtaining intraoral digital impressions of implants. J
Am Dent Assoc. 2014;145(4):338–44. 103. Sánchez-Monescillo A, Sánchez-Turrión A, Vellon-Domarco E, Salinas-Goodier C, PradosFrutos J. Photogrammetry Impression Technique: A Case History Report. Int J Prosthodont [Internet]. 2016 Jan;29(1):71–3. Available from: http://quintpub.com/journals/ijp/abstract.php?iss2_id=1348&article_id=15903&article=14&t itle=Photogrammetry Impression Technique: A Case History Report#.V-Q2c4Whxz8 104. Penarrocha D oltra, Agustin R panadero, Pradies G, Gomar S vercher, Penarrocha M diago. Maxillary Full-Arch Immediately Loaded Implant-Supported Fixed Prosthesis Designed and Produced by Photogrammetry and Digital Printing: A Clinical Report. J Prosthodont Complex Restorations. 2016;241–9. 105. Agustín-panadero R, Peñarrocha-oltra D. Stereophotogrammetry for Recording the Position of. 2015;28(6):631–6. 106. Peñarrocha-Diago M, Balaguer-Martí JC, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Balaguer-Martínez JF, Peñarrocha-Diago M, Agustín-Panadero R. A combined digital and stereophotogrammetric technique for rehabilitation with immediate loading of complete-arch, implant-supported prostheses: A randomized controlled pilot clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2017;118(5):596–603. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.12.015 107. Suarez M, Paisal I, Rodriguez-Alonso V, Lopez-Suarez C. Combined Stereophotogrammetry and Laser-Sintered, Computer-Aided Milling Framework for an Implant-Supported Mandibular Prosthesis: A Case History Report. Int J Prosthodont. 2017;60–2. 108. Gómez-Polo M, Gómez-Polo C, del Río J, Ortega R. Stereophotogrammetric impression making for polyoxymethylene, milled immediate partial fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2018;119(4):506–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.04.029 109. Lin W, Harris DDSBT, Elathamna DMDEN, Abdel-azim T, Morton DDSD. Implant-Level Impressions : An In Vitro Comparative Study. 2015;30(1). 110. Abduo J, Jyons K, Bennani V, Waddell N SM. Fit of screw-retained fixed implant frameworks fabricated by different methods: a sistematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2011;24(3):207–20. 111. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: Clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(1):26–35. 112. Ender A, Zimmermann M, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro. Int J Comput Dent [Internet]. 2019;22(1):11–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30848250
113. Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):1–13. 114. Mangano FG, Veronesi G, Hauschild U, Mijiritsk E, Mangano C. Trueness and precision of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: A comparative in vitro study. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):1–18. 115. Lee JH. Improved digital impressions of edentulous areas. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2017;117(3):448–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.019 116. Papaspyridakos P, Chen Y wei, Gonzalez-Gusmao I, Att W. Complete digital workflow in prosthesis prototype fabrication for complete-arch implant rehabilitation: A technique. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2019;1–4. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.02.004 117. Monaco C, Ragazzini N, Scheda L, Evangelisti E. A fully digital approach to replicate functional and aesthetic parameters in implant-supported full-arch rehabilitation. J Prosthodont Res [Internet]. 2018 Jul;62(3):383–5. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1883195817301147 118. Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Nyström I, Rydén J, Thor A. Accuracy and precision of 3 intraoral scanners and accuracy of conventional impressions: A novel in vivo analysis method. J Dent [Internet]. 2018;69(November 2017):110–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.12.006 119. Dehurtevent M, Robberecht L, Béhin P. Influence of dentist experience with scan spray systems used in direct CAD/CAM impressions. J Prosthet Dent [Internet]. 2015;113(1):17– 21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.006 120. Stimmelmayr M, Güth J. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit — an in vitro study. 2012;851–6.