Publication: Una contribución al debate sobre la desestabilización de los estables. Del riesgo y de la vulnerabilidad socioeconómica asimétrica a la vulnerabilidad percibida relacional en la ciudad de Madrid
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2019-12-03
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El presente trabajo comienza con una reflexión y revisión crítica sobre la tesis de la sociedad del riesgo o riesgo global mediante la propuesta y la investigación de un riesgo concreto y de una vulnerabilidad delimitada. Reflexión y revisión que sirven para evidenciar y analizar las asimetrías que siguen existiendo dentro de este paradigma si consideramos una tipología específica de mencionado riesgo y de la vulnerabilidad que construye: la socioeconómica. Con este planteamiento se puede demostrar que la vulnerabilidad socioeconómica no se ha generalizado pues, esencialmente, sigue afectando de manera asimétrica a los grupos de población. Sigue siendo asimétrica, en primer lugar, por el efecto de la interacción entre la persistente crisis económica y el consiguiente debilitamiento del Estado Social (lo que en estas páginas se denominará desprotección institucional); efecto que no ha hecho sino subrayar la posición diferenciada de los segmentos de población ante el impacto de unos riesgos contextualizados en la desigualdad. De ahí, en segundo término, la oportuna puesta en debate de algunas investigaciones científicas que conceptualizan la vulnerabilidad como un proceso que se extiende espacial y socialmente y que conduce a la llamada desestabilización de los estables...
This research begins with a critical review of the risk society/global risk thesis by proposing and studying a specific risk and vulnerability . Critical review that serves to highlight and analyze the asymmetries that continue to exist in this paradigm if we consider a specific type of risk and the vulnerability it produces: the socioeconomic. With this approach, it can be demonstrated that socioeconomic vulnerability has not been generalized because it continues to affect selectively the population groups. It remains selective since the interaction between the persistent economic crisis and the consequent weakening of the Welfare State (what in these pages is called lack of institutional protection), has highlighted a differentiated positioning of the population for the impact of risks. This differentiated positioning is derived, in reality, from contextual inequalities. Secondly, it is launched into the theoretical debate on the conceptualization of vulnerability as a process that is extended spatially and socially and that is leading to an alleged destabilization of the stable...
This research begins with a critical review of the risk society/global risk thesis by proposing and studying a specific risk and vulnerability . Critical review that serves to highlight and analyze the asymmetries that continue to exist in this paradigm if we consider a specific type of risk and the vulnerability it produces: the socioeconomic. With this approach, it can be demonstrated that socioeconomic vulnerability has not been generalized because it continues to affect selectively the population groups. It remains selective since the interaction between the persistent economic crisis and the consequent weakening of the Welfare State (what in these pages is called lack of institutional protection), has highlighted a differentiated positioning of the population for the impact of risks. This differentiated positioning is derived, in reality, from contextual inequalities. Secondly, it is launched into the theoretical debate on the conceptualization of vulnerability as a process that is extended spatially and socially and that is leading to an alleged destabilization of the stable...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, Departamento de Sociología Aplicada, leída el 30-09-2019