Publication: Para una superación del paradigma epistemológico: Rorty a través de su doble lectura de Heidegger
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2020-03-06
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El objetivo de esta tesis doctoral es analizar cómo es, si es que la hay, la ruptura de Richard Rorty con una cosmovisión platónica de la filosofía, y estudiar si finalmente estájustificado decir que logra o no la superación del paradigma epistemológico para emprender un «giro pragmático». Para llevar a cabo nuestro cometido empleamos una metodología que consiste en contrastar las tesis epistemológicas de Rorty con las de un pensador que comparte su crítica a la epistemología desde un lugar quizá antagónico: Martin Heidegger. Consideramos que desde un punto de vista metodológico la confrontación entre dos pensadores permite profundizar en la comprensión de los argumentos de uno y otro lado, así como detectar carencias respecto a sus propias pretensiones y, en definitiva, permite poner a prueba los diferentes argumentos filosóficos para obtener una respuesta justificada a la pregunta que guía esta investigación...
The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to analyze the divergence –in the case that said divergence exists– of Richard Rorty from a Platonic worldview of philosophy. In this investigation, we study Rorty’s treatment of the epistemological paradigm and his production of a pragmatic turn. In order to complete our objectives, we employ a methodology that compares Rorty’s epistemological theses with those of Martin Heidegger, a thinker who shares Rorty’s criticism of epistemology albeit from a more antagonistic point of view. From a methodological standpoint, we argue that an analysis of the confrontation between Rorty and Heidegger allows for a clarification of the positions of both thinkers, and for the identification of flaws in their individual claims. In short, our methodology allows us to analyze different philosophical arguments in order to arrive at a more complete understanding of Rorty’s pragmatic turn...
The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to analyze the divergence –in the case that said divergence exists– of Richard Rorty from a Platonic worldview of philosophy. In this investigation, we study Rorty’s treatment of the epistemological paradigm and his production of a pragmatic turn. In order to complete our objectives, we employ a methodology that compares Rorty’s epistemological theses with those of Martin Heidegger, a thinker who shares Rorty’s criticism of epistemology albeit from a more antagonistic point of view. From a methodological standpoint, we argue that an analysis of the confrontation between Rorty and Heidegger allows for a clarification of the positions of both thinkers, and for the identification of flaws in their individual claims. In short, our methodology allows us to analyze different philosophical arguments in order to arrive at a more complete understanding of Rorty’s pragmatic turn...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía, Departamento de Lógica y Filosofía Teórica, leída el 27-11-2019