Publication: Efectividad de una matriz gingival en el aumento de volumen de tejido blando periimplantario en comparación con el injerto de conectivo: estudio clínico aleatorizado
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2020
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Objetivo principal
Comparar la eficacia de los procedimientos de aumento de volumen de tejido blando utilizando el injerto de tejido autógeno frente a una matriz de colágeno, para obtener un mayor grosor de la mucosa dos años después de la colocación de la restauración final.
Objetivos secundarios
- Determinar si el uso de la matriz de colágeno presenta algún efecto adverso a corto y medio plazo. - Comparar la salud periimplantaria en función del material empleado para el aumento. - Valorar la cantidad de encía queratinizada neoformada en función del grupo de estudio. - Determinar cuál de los dos materiales de injerto proporciona mejores parámetros estéticos. - Establecer qué material es mejor valorado por el paciente. - Concretar el ahorro medio en tiempo al utilizar una matriz de colágeno
Description
Trabajo Fin de Master encuadrado en la línea de investigación Eficacia de los protocolos quirúrgicos y regenerativos en implantología.
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1.Cardaropoli G, Araújo M and Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30(9):809-18.
2. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2003;23(4):313-23.
3. Lam RV. Contour changes of the alveolar processes following extractions. J Prosthet Dent 1960;10:25–32.
4. Yang LM, Wessel CJ. The Deficient Alveolar Ridge: Classification and Augmentation Considerations for Implant Placement., Clin Update. 2017;39:1-2.
5. Papi P, Pompa G. The Use of a Novel Porcine Derived Acellular Dermal Matrix (Mucoderm) in Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Pilot Cohort Study. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:1-9.
6. Caton JG, Armitage G, Berglundh T, Chapple ILC, Jepsen S, Kornman KS, et al. A new classification scheme for periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions - Introduction and key changes from the 1999 classification. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:S1-8.
7. Chapple ILC, Mealey BL, Van Dyke TE, Bartold PM, Dommisch H, Eickholz P, et al. Periodontal health and gingival diseases and conditions on an intact and a reduced periodontium: Consensus report of workgroup 1 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018;89:S74-84.
8. Moraschini V, Luz D, Velloso G, Barboza E dS. P. Quality assessment of systematic reviews of the significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1 de junio de 2017;46(6):774-81.
9. De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. 2009;36(5):428-33.
0. Cosyn J, Pollaris L, Van der Linden F, De Bruyn H. Minimally Invasive Single Implant Treatment (M.I.S.I.T.) based on ridge preservation and contour augmentation in patients with a high aesthetic risk profile: one-year results. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(4):398-405.
11. Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker B.E, Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Higuchi K et al. The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction sockets: a prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(1):31-40.
12. Lang NP, Hammerle CH, Bragger U, Lehmann B & Nyman SR. Guided tissue regeneration in jawbone defects prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;5(2):92-7.
13. Carpio L, Loza J, Lynch S & Genco R. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers. J Periodontol. 2000;71(11):1743-9.
14. Wessing B, Urban I, Montero E, Zechner W, Hof M, Alández Chamorro J, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial using a new resorbable non-crosslinked collagen membrane for guided bone regeneration at dehisced single implant sites: interim results of a bone augmentation procedure. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2017;28(11):e218-26.
15. Misch CM. Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12(6):767-76.
16. Garcia J, Dodge A, Luepke P, Wang H-L, Kapila Y, Lin G-H. Effect of membrane exposure on guided bone regeneration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018;29(3):328-38.
17. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018;29:32-49.
18. Thoma DS, Benić GI, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE. A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2009;20:146-65.
19. Lissek M, Boeker M, Happe A. How Thick Is the Oral Mucosa around Implants after Augmentation with Different Materials: A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Substitute Matrices in Comparison to Connective Tissue Grafts. IJMS. 2020;21(14):5043.
20. Costa Berenguer X, Díez Pérez R, Bascones Martínez A. Cirugía plástica en implantes del sector anterior. Avances en Periodoncia [Internet]. 2017;29( 2 ): 6775.
21. Lee J-S, Cha J-K, Kim C-S. Alveolar ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized porcine versus bovine bone minerals: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res.2018;20(5):729-37.
22. Aguilar M, Cañamas M, Ibáñez P, Gil F. Importancia del uso de índices en la práctica periodontal diaria del higienista dental. Periodoncia. 2003; 13(1): 233-244.
23. Fürhauser R. Índice estético rosa (Pink Esthetic Score) en la práctica clínica. Periodoncia y Osteointegración. 2014; 24: 65-9.
24. Tinti, C., Parma-Benfenati, S. (1995) Coronally Positioned Palatal Sliding Flap, Int J Periodont Rest Dent 15, 298-310.
25. Zeltner M, Jung RE, H.mmerle CHF, Hüsler J, Thoma DS. Randomized controlled clinical study comparing a volume-stable collagen matrix to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites: linear volumetric soft tissue changes up to 3 months. J Clin.Periodontol.2017;44(4):446-53.
26. Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, Martin C, Orsini M. Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol.2009;36(10):868-76.
27. Thoma DS, Benic GI, Zwahlen M, Hammerle CH & Jung RE. A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20 Suppl 4:146-65.
28. Mohammadi M, Shokrgozar MA & Mofid R. Culture of human gingival fibroblasts on a biodegradable scaffold and evaluation of its effect on attached gingiva: a randomized, controlled pilot study. J Periodontol.2007;78(10):1897-903.
29. Wessel JR & Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008;79(3):425-30.
30. Dordick B, Coslet JG & Seibert JS. Clinical evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts placed on alveolar bone. Part i. Clinical predictability. J Periodontol.1976;47(10):559-67.
31. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Nunn ME & Lavin PT. A pilot study to evaluate a tissue engineered bi-layered cell therapy as an alternative to tissue from the palate. J Periodontol. 2008;79(10):1847-56.
32. Wennström JL, Derks J. Is there a need for keratinized mucosa around implants to maintain health and tissue stability? Clin Oral Implants Res.2012;23:136-46.
33. Chung DM, Oh T-J, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang H-L. Significance of Keratinized Mucosa in Maintenance of Dental Implants With Different Surfaces. Journal of Periodontology. agosto de 2006;77(8):1410-20.
34. Thoma DS, Naenni N, Figuero E, Hämmerle CHF, Schwarz F, Jung RE, et al. Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res.2018;29:32-49.
35. Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J, Kerckaert I & Van Hoof T. Ultrasonic Assessment of Mucosal Thickness around Implants: Validity, Reproducibility, and Stability of Connective Tissue Grafts at the Buccal Aspect. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(1):51-61.
36. Migliorati M, Amorfini L, Signori A, Biavati AS & Benedicenti S. Clinical and Aesthetic Outcome with Post-Extractive Implants with or without Soft Tissue Augmentation: A 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(5):983-95.
37. Fickl S, Schneider D, Zuhr O, Hinze M, Ender A, Jung RE & Hurzeler MB. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(5):442-8.
38. Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE & Hurzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(6):593-603.
39. Schneider D, Grunder U, Ender A, Hammerle CH & Jung RE. Volume gain and stability of peri-implant tissue following bone and soft tissue augmentation: 1-year results from a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(1):28-37.
40. Thoma DS, Jung RE, Schneider D, Cochran DL, Ender A, Jones AA, Gorlach C, Uebersax L, Graf-Hausner U & Hammerle CH. Soft tissue volumen augmentation by the use of collagen-based matrices: a volumetric analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(7):659-66.