Publication: El concepto de ciencia política en la temprana filosofía moderna: los casos de Maquiavelo, Hobbes y Spinoza
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2021-02-16
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La presente investigación tiene como objetivo analizar la forma en la cual lo político es concebido dentro del pensamiento filosófico de Maquiavelo, Hobbes y Spinoza. En la obra de estos tres pensadores el estudio de lo político adquiere la forma de una reflexión sobre el poder, la soberanía y el Estado lo cual nos obligará a revisar si la perspectiva desde la cual cada uno de estos autores piensan lo político puede denominarse científica. Si bien esta investigación encara el problema de la formación del concepto de ciencia política en la temprana filosofía moderna, su objetivo y metodología no se inscriben dentro de las coordenadas de la historia intelectual. Por el contrario, buscamos revisar el concepto de ciencia política desde una perspectiva histórico-fenoménica desdela cual, si bien se consideran las advertencias que la historia intelectual hace a fin de evitar incurrir en anacronismos, lo que se busca no es atender a la génesis histórica del concepto de ciencia política sino, sobre todo, a las implicaciones metafísicas y epistemológicas inherentes en dicho concepto. Es por ello que, a lo largo de la presente investigación, consideraremos fundamental analizar la forma en la cual el pensamiento de Maquiavelo, Hobbes y Spinoza se distancian de concepciones escolásticas que buscan reducir el estudio de lo político a una antropología basada en principios teleológicos...
The aim of the following dissertation is to analyze the concept of political science in Machiavelli’s, Hobbes’ and Spinoza’s philosophies. I begin by considering Machiavelli’s rejection of scholasticism and Christianism as well as his opposition to Aristotle’s ethics. I shall argue also, contrary to Leo Strauss, that Machiavelli’s political thought cannot be considered part of early modern philosophy.This dissertation is focused on the concept of political science in early modern thought. I analyze the concept of political science in early modern thought by regarding its relationship to metaphysics as well as epistemology and anthropology. I do not follow a methodological approach along the lines of intellectual history. Rather, I consider the power of elicitation of the concept of political science by analyzing its epistemological and metaphysical foundations. This power emerges by analyzing the way in which that concept is able to unify ethical, historical and anti-teleological considerations of a general idea of power and sovereignty...
The aim of the following dissertation is to analyze the concept of political science in Machiavelli’s, Hobbes’ and Spinoza’s philosophies. I begin by considering Machiavelli’s rejection of scholasticism and Christianism as well as his opposition to Aristotle’s ethics. I shall argue also, contrary to Leo Strauss, that Machiavelli’s political thought cannot be considered part of early modern philosophy.This dissertation is focused on the concept of political science in early modern thought. I analyze the concept of political science in early modern thought by regarding its relationship to metaphysics as well as epistemology and anthropology. I do not follow a methodological approach along the lines of intellectual history. Rather, I consider the power of elicitation of the concept of political science by analyzing its epistemological and metaphysical foundations. This power emerges by analyzing the way in which that concept is able to unify ethical, historical and anti-teleological considerations of a general idea of power and sovereignty...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía, leída el 13-07-2020