Publication: Do ‘soft law’ board gender quotas work? Evidence from a natural experiment
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2019
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
In a new era of “open governance”, in which societal and corporate change is taking place, 15 predominantly European countries, including Spain, enacted board gender quotas to increase the share of women on boards. In this paper, we explore the effectiveness of the European Union’s first “soft” quota the 2007 Spanish Gender Equality Act recommending all large public and private Spanish firms to appoint a target of 40 percent of each gender to serve as board directors by 2015. The Act provides an incentive in that quota compliant firms may receive a preference for the tendering of public contracts. We draw on institutional and resource dependency theories to motivate the first empirical test of a “soft” quota which is distinct from Norway’s “hard law” board gender quota, and more similar to the proposed EU-wide quota. Using a large novel panel of 767 Spanish firms and 2786 firm-year observations from 2005 to 2014, we exploit the Spanish Act as a natural experiment and employ a difference-in-differences model. We find that less than nine percent of targeted firms fully comply with the quota. Firms that depend on public contracts are significantly more likely to increase female representation, although quota compliant firms do not actually benefit from the Act’s potential incentive. The results highlight the Spanish government’s lack of commitment to the quota, and that the quota’s normative obligations did not trigger the adoption of gender-balanced boards.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Aguilera, R., Judge, W., & Terjesen, S. (2018). Corporate governance deviance. Academy of Management Review, 43, 87e109.
Ahern, K. R., & Dittmar, A. K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 137e197.
Armstrong, J., & Walby, S. (2012). Gender quotas in management boards: Briefing note for the European Parliament, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, PE 462.429.
Arnardottir, A. A., & Sigurjonsson, T. O. (2017). Gender diversity on boards in Iceland: Pathway to gender quota law following a financial crisis. In C. Seierstad,
P. Gabaldon, & H. Mensi-Klarbach (Eds.), Gender diversity in the boardroom (pp. 75e101). Palgrave Macmillan.
Arosa, B., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2010). Ownership structure and firm performance in non-listed firms: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Family Business
Strategy, 1, 88e96.
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Identification and inference in nonlinear difference-in-differences models. Econometrica, 74(2), 431e497.
Baltrunaite, A., Bello, P., Casarico, A., & Profeta, P. (2014). Gender quotas and the quality of politicians. Journal of Public Economics, 118, 62e74.
Barroso, C., Villegas, M. M., & P�erez Calero, L. (2011). Board influence on a firm’s internationalization. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19,
351e367.
Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2015). Women on corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance: An International
Review, 23(2), 129e144.
Bøhren, Ø., & Staubo, S. (2014). Does mandatory gender balance work? Changing organizational form to avoid board upheaval. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 152e168.
Bustelo, M. (2016). Three decades of state feminism and gender equality policies in multi-governed Spain. Sex Roles, 74, 107e120.
Campbell, K., & Minguez-Vera, A. M. (2010). Female board appointments and firm valuation: Short and long-term effects. Journal of Management & Governance, 14,
37e59.
Cerulli, G. (2015). Econometric evaluation of socio-economic programs: Theory and applications. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
Conde-Ruiz, J. I., & Hoya, C. (2015). Gender (in)equality act and large Spanish corporations. FEDEA Working Paper, 2015-03.
Dahlerup, D., & Freidenvall, L. (2005). Quotas as a ‘fast track’ to equal representation for women: Why Scandinavia is no longer the model. International Feminist
Journal of Politics, 7(1), 26e48.
Dale-Olsen, H., Schøne, P., & Verner, M. (2013). Diversity among Norwegian boards of directors: Does a quota for women improve firm performance? Feminist
Economics, 19, 110e135
Doshi, A. R., Dowell, G. W. S., & Toffel, M. W. (2013). How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1209e1231.
Espa~nola, C. (1983). Informe sociol�ogico sobre el cambio social en Espa~na, 1975/1983.Madrid: Fundación FOESSA.
Esteve-Volart, B., & Bagues, M. (2012). Are women pawns in the political game? Evidence from elections to the Spanish senate. Journal of Public Economics, 96(3), 387e399. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type¼TC&
reference¼P7-TC1-COD-2012-0299&language¼EN. (Accessed 24 November 2017).
Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D. C., & Cannella, A. A., Jr. (2009). Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executive, top management teams, and boards. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Franceschet, S., & Piscopo, J. M. (2013). Equality, democracy, and the broadening and deepening of gender quotas. Politics and Gender, 9(3), 310e316.
Gabaldon, P., Anca, C., Mateos de Cabo, R., & Gimeno, R. (2016). Searching for women on boards: An analysis from the supply and demand perspective.
Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24, 371e385.
Gabaldon, P., & Gim�enez, D. (2017). Gender diversity on boards in Spain: A nonmandatory quota. In C. Seierstad, P. Gabaldon, & H. Mensi-Klarbach (Eds.),
Gender diversity in the boardroom (pp. 47e74). Cham: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Gallego, I., García, I., & Rodríguez, L. (2010). The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance. Spanish Accounting Review, 13(1), 53e88.
Garay, U., & Gonz�alez, M. (2008). Corporate governance and firm value: The case of Venezuela. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 194e209.
Gender Equality Act. (2007). Constitutional Act 3/2007 of 22 March for effective equality between women and men. Madrid.
Gonz�alez-Menéndez, M. C., & Martínez-Gonz�alez, L. (2012). Spain on the Norwegian pathway: Towards a gender-balanced presence of women on corporate boards.
In C. Fagan, M. Gonz�alez-Men�endez, & S. G�omez-Ans�on (Eds.), Women on corporate boards and in top management (pp. 169e197). Basingstoke: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 25, 1404e1427.
Htun, M. N., & Jones, M. P. (2002). Engendering the right to participate in decisionmaking:Electoral quotas and women’s leadership in Latin America. In N. Craske, & M. Molyneux (Eds.), Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America (32-56). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hughes, M. M., Paxton, P., & Krook, M. L. (2017). Gender quotas for legislatures and corporate boards. Annual Review of Sociology, 43, 331e352.
Iannotta, M., Gatti, M., & Huse, M. (2016). Institutional complementarities and gender diversity on boards: A configurational approach. Corporate Governance:
An International Review, 24, 406e427.
Izquierdo, M., Huse, M., & M€oltner, H. (2016). Value creating boards and gender diversity: Suggestions to progress in getting women on boards in Spain. BI Norwegian Business School Research Report, 2/2016.
Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., & Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of Management,
39, 232e262.
Kirsch, A. (2017). Women’s access to boards in Germany: Regulation and symbolic change. In C. Seierstad, P. Gabaldon, & H. Mensi-Klarbach (Eds.), Gender diversity
in the boardroom (pp. 205e232). Palgrave Macmillan.
Kogut, B., Colomer, J., & Belinky, M. (2014). Structural equality at the top of the corporation: Mandated quotas for women directors. Strategic Management
Journal, 35, 891e902.
Krook, M. L., Lovenduski, J., & Squires, J. (2009). Gender quotas and models of political citizenship. British Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 781e803.
Kruisinga, S. A., & Senden, L. (2017). Gender diversity on corporate boards in The Netherlands: Waiting on the world to change. In C. Seierstad, P. Gabaldon, &
H. Mensi-Klarbach (Eds.), Gender diversity in the boardroom (pp. 177e204). Palgrave-Macmillan.
Levrau, A. (2017). Belgium: Male/female united in the boardroom. In C. Seierstad, P. Gabaldon, & H. Mensi-Klarbach (Eds.), Gender diversity in the boardroom (pp.
155e175). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lombardo, E., & Verge, T. (2017). Cuotas de g�enero en política y economía Regulacilacióny configuración institucional en Espa~na. Politica Y Gobierno, 24(2),
301e331.
Malatesta, D., & Smith, C. R. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review,
74, 14e25.
Mateos de Cabo, R., Gimeno, R., & Escot, L. (2011). Disentangling discrimination on Spanish boards of Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19,77-95.
Matsa, D. A., & Miller, A. R. (2013). A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5, 136e169.
Meier, P. (2004). The mutual contagion effect of legal and party quotas: A Belgian perspective. Party Politics, 10(5), 583e600.
Meyer, B. D. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(2), 151e161.
Nekhili, M., & Gatfaoui, H. (2013). Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on French
boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 227e249.
Nygaard, K. (2011). Forced board changes: Evidence from Norway. Norwegian School of Economics. Department of Economics Discussion Paper 5.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
Piscopo, J. M., & Clark-Muntean, S. (2018). Corporate quotas and symbolic politics in advanced democracies. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 39(3), 285e309.
Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546e1571.
Profeta, P., Aliberti, L., Casarico, A., D’Amico, M., & Puccio, A. (2014). Women directors: The Italian way and beyond. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.
Reguera-Alvarado, N., de Fuentes, P., & Laffarga, J. (2017). Does board gender diversity influence financial performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business
Ethics, 141(2), 337e350.
Seierstad, C. (2016). Beyond the business case: The need for both utility and justice rationales for increasing the share of women on boards. Corporate Governance:
An International Review, 24(4), 390e405.
Teigen, M. (2012). Gender quotas on corporate boards: On the diffusion of a distinct national policy reform. In F. Engelstad, & M. Teigen (Eds.), Firms, boards and
gender quotas: Comparative perspectives (pp. 115e146). Emerald.
Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors.
Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 233e251.
Terjesen, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Board gender quotas: Exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26, 23e65.
Vinnicombe, S., Doldor, E., Sealy, R., Pryce, P., & Turner, C. (2015). The female FTSE board report 2015.
Zenou, E., Allemand, I., & Brullebaut, B. (2017). Gender diversity on French boards:
Example of a success from a hard law. In C. Seierstad, P. Gabaldon, & H. Mensi-Klarbach (Eds.), Gender diversity in the boardroom (pp. 103e124). Palgrave-Macmillan.