Publication: Estudio comparativo de dos sistemas de postes de fibra en la restauración de dientes endodonciados: análisis volumétrico y de microfiltración
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2021
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Los postes del grupo 1, de forma cónica, presentaron en general una mejor adaptación a las paredes del conducto en toda su longitud que los postes del grupo 2, de forma cilíndrica.2.Los postes del grupo 1 contienen fibras de mayor diámetro, con menos densidad de fibras por mm2 y con una ratio fibra/resina ligeramente superior que los postes del grupo 2. 3.La mayoría de los defectos de interfase se localizaron en la unión cementodentina, no en la unión cemento-poste 4.A mayor cantidad de cemento de resina en el interior del conducto mayor probabilidad de encontrar defectos de relleno en el interior de los conductos radiculares.5.La mayoría de los defectos de relleno se encontraron en el tercio coronal.6.Los sistemas de postes múltiples presentaron mayor número de defectos de rellenos y de mayor tamaño, que los sistemas de postes únicos.7.Con respecto a la microfiltración, no existieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los dos tipos de poste, aunque se observó una mayor tendencia a la filtración en el grupo 2. 8.No existió relación entre el porcentaje de defectos de relleno y la filtración observada en el interior de los conductos radiculares.9.Son necesarios más estudios sobre este sistema de postes múltiples, tanto in vitro como in vivo, para poder predecir su comportamiento clínico
Description
Trabajo de Fin de Máster Ciencias Odontológica, Facultad de Odontología UCM, Departamento de Odontología Conservadora y Prótesis, Curso 2020/2021
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
1. Sorrentino R, Di Mauro MI, Ferrari M, Leone R, Zarone F. Complications of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and single crowns or fixed dental prostheses—a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20 (7): 1449–57.
2. Falakaloğlu S, Adıgüzel Ö, Özdemir G. Root canal reconstruction using biological dentin posts: A 3D finite element analysis. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects.
2019; 13 (4): 274–80.
3. Figueiredo FED, Martins-Filho PRS, Faria-E-Silva AL. Do metal post-retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post-retained restorations?
A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015; 41 (3): 309–16.
4. Bru E, Forner L, Llena C, Almenar A. Fibre post behaviour prediction factors. A review of the literature. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013; 5 (3): 150–3.
5. Uzun I, Keleş A, Arslan H, Güler B, Keskin C, Gündüz K. Influence of oval and circular post placement using different resin cements on push-out bond strength and void volume analysed by micro-CT. Int Endod J. 2016; 49 (12):
1175–82.
6. Maroulakos G, He J, Nagy WW. The Post–endodontic Adhesive Interface: Theoretical Perspectives and Potential Flaws. J Endod. 2018; 44 (3): 363–71.
7. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration. J Dent Res. 1987; 66 (11): 1636–9.
8. Yikilgan İ, Uzun O, Gürel M, Bala O, Ömürlü H, Kayaoglu G. Volumetric Evaluation of Void/Gap Formation and Microleakage Cementing Fiber Posts on Extracted Teeth with Three Different Cements. J Prosthodont. 2019; 28 (1): 222–
8.
9. Makarewicz D, Le Bell-Rönnlöf A-MB, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Effect of Cementation Technique of Individually Formed Fiber-Reinforced Composite Post on Bond Strength and Microleakage. Open Dent J. 2013; 7 (1): 68–75.
10. Porciani PF, Vano M, Radovic I, Goracci C, Grandini S, García-Godoy F, et al. Fracture resistance of fiber posts: Combinations of several small posts vs.
standardized single post. Am J Dent. 2008; 21 (6): 373–6.
11. Uzun I, Arslan H, Doʇanay E, Güler B, Keskin C, Çapar ID. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots with oval canals restored with oval and circular posts. J Endod. 2015; 41 (4): 539–43.
12. Başaran EG, Ayna E, Halifeoǧlu M. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with 3 different adhesive systems and 4 different fiber-reinforced posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2012; 107 (4): 239–51.
13. Nawrocka A, Łukomska-Szymańska M. Extracted human teeth and their utility in dental research. Recommendations on proper preservation: A literature review. Dent Med Probl. 2019; 56 (2): 185–90.
14. Geramipanah F, Rezaei SMM, Sichani SF, Sichani BF, Sadighpour L. Microleakage of different post systems and a custom adapted fiber post. J Dent (Tehran) [Internet]. 2013; 10 (1): 94–102.
15. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal preparations in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1971; 32 (2): 271–5.
16. Cohen, Stephen; Burns RC. Vias de la pulpa. 8o. Elsevier, editor. Madrid; 2002. 244 p.
17. Thomas AS, Hartwell GR, Moon PC. The accuracy of the root ZX electronic apex locator using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files. J Endod. 2003; 29 (10):
662–3.
18. Shalini Singh, Muqthadir Siddiqui Mohammed Abdul, Utsav Sharma , Shan Sainudeen, Chayan Jain JTK. Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments: Development of the Single‑File Systems. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017; 8 (5): 71–81.
19. Elnaghy A, Elsaka S. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography. Indian J Dent Res. 2016; 27 (1):
37–41.
20. Nishad, Sonalkumari; Shivamurthy G. Comparative Analysis of Apical Root Crack Propagation after Root Canal Preparation at Different Instrumentation Lengths Using ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Gold Rotary Files: An In vitro Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018; 9 (1): S33–8.
21. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN. Clinical Implications and Microbiology of Bacterial Persistence after Treatment Procedures. J Endod. 2008; 34 (11).
22. Virdee SS, Farnell DJJ, Silva MA, Camilleri J, Cooper PR, Tomson PL. The influence of irrigant activation, concentration and contact time on sodium hypochlorite penetration into root dentine: an ex vivo experiment. Int Endod J. 2020; 53 (7): 986–97.
23. Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Wang Z, Gao Y. Irrigation in endodontics. Br Dent J. 2014; 216 (6): 299–303.
24. Duque JA, Duarte MAH, Canali LCF, Zancan RF, Vivan RR, Bernardes RA, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of New Mechanical Irrigant Agitating Devices for
Debris Removal from the Canal and Isthmus of Mesial Roots of Mandibular Molars. J Endod. 2017; 43 (2): 326–31.
25. Laith Konstantinos B. Comparison between three glass fiber post cementation techniques. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017; 8 (1): 29.
26. Comba A, Scotti N, Mazzoni A, Maravic T, Ribeiro Cunha S, Michelotto Tempesta R, et al. Carbodiimide inactivation of matrix metalloproteinases in radicular dentine. J Dent. 2019; 82 (October 2018): 56–62.
27. Breschi L, Maravic T, Comba A, Ribeiro S, Loguercio AD, Reis A, et al. Chlorhexidine preserves the hybrid layer in vitro after 10-years aging. Dent Mater. 2020
28. Skupien JA die., Sarkis-Onofre R, Cenci MS érgi., Moraes RR att. de, PereiraCenci T. A systematic review of factors associated with the retention of glass fiber posts. Braz Oral Res. 2015; 29 (1): 1–8.
29. Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent. 2002; 30 (2–3): 83–90.
30. Vicente P. A. Saboiaa, Fernando Natob, Annalisa Mazzonic, Giovanna Orsinid, Angelo Putignanoe, Marcelo Gianninif, Lorenzo Breschi. Adhesion of a Two-step Etch-and-Rinse Collagen-depleted Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10: 419–22.
31. Bahari M, Savadi Oskoee S, Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Saati Khosroshahi E. Effect of Light Intensity on the Degree of Conversion of Dual-cured Resin Cement at Different Depths with the use of Translucent Fiber Posts. J Dent (Tehran). 2014; 11 (3): 248–24855.
32. Gołąbek H, Borys KM, Kohli MR, Brus-Sawczuk K, Struzycka I. Chemical aspect of sodium hypochlorite activation in obtaining favorable outcomes of endodontic treatment: An in-vitro study. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2019; 28 (10): 1311–9.
33. Gonçalves LS, Rodrigues RCV, Andrade Junior CV, Soares RG, Vettore MV. The effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine as irrigant solutions for root canal disinfection: A systematic review of clinical trials. J Endod. 2016; 42 (4): 527–32.
34. Abuhaimed TS, Neel EAA. Sodium Hypochlorite Irrigation and Its Effect on Bond Strength to Dentin. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017.
35. Sung-Ho Jung 1, Kyung-San Min, Hoon-Sang Chang, Sung-Do Park, Soon-Nyu Kwon J-MB. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98 (4): 270–6.
36. Neves AA, Jaecques S, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Coutinho E, Lührs AK, et al. 3Dmicroleakage assessment of adhesive interfaces: Exploratory findings by μcT.
Dent Mater. 2014; 30 (8): 799–807.
37. Yamauchi K, Tsujimoto A, Jurado CA, Shimatani Y, Nagura Y, Takamizawa T, et al. Etch-and-rinse vs self-etch mode for dentin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives. J Oral Sci. 2019; 61 (4): 549–53.
38. Weiser F, Behr M. Self-Adhesive Resin Cements: A Clinical Review. J Prosthodont. 2015; 24 (2): 100–8.
39. Nagarkar S, Theis-Mahon N, Perdigão J. Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance. J Biomed Mater Res - Part B Appl Biomater. 2019; 107 (6): 2121–31.
40. Perdigão J, Loguercio AD. Universal or Multi-mode Adhesives: Why and How? J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16 (2): 193–4.
41. Perdigão J, Muñoz MA, Sezinando A, Luque-Martinez I V., Staichak R, Reis A, et al. Immediate adhesive properties to dentin and enamel of a universal adhesive associated with a hydrophobic resin coat. Oper Dent. 2014; 39 (5): 489–99.
42. Perdigão J, Kose C, Mena-Serrano AP, De Paula EA, Tay LY, Reis A, et al. A new Universal simplified adhesive: 18-month clinical evaluation. Oper Dent. 2014; 39
(2): 113–27.
43. Abreu R, Monteiro J, Abu-Hasna A, Santos T, Dal Piva A, Pucci C, et al. Bond strength of cemented fiber posts to teeth with simulated internal root resorption. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020; 12 (3).
44. Liu C, Liu H, Qian YT, Zhu S, Zhao SQ. The influence of four dual-cure resin cements and surface treatment selection to bond strength of fiber post. Int J Oral Sci. 2014; 6 (1): 56–60.
45. Gendron R, Grenier D, Sorsa T, Mayrand D. Inhibition of the activities of matrix metalloproteinases 2, 8, and 9 by chlorhexidine. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999; 6 (3): 437–9.
46. Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dent Mater. 2018; 34 (1): 13–28.
47. Marchionatti AME, Wandscher VF, Rippe MP, Kaizer OB, Valandro LF. Clinical performance and failure modes of pulpless teeth restored with posts: a systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2017; 31: e64.
48. de Sousa-Neto MD, Silva-Sousa YC, Mazzi-Chaves JF, Carvalho KKT, Barbosa AFS, Versiani MA, et al. Root canal preparation using micro-computed tomography analysis: A literature review. Braz Oral Res. 2018; 32: 20–43.
49. Stringheta CP, Bueno CES, Kato AS, Freire LG, Iglecias EF, Santos M, et al. Microcomputed tomographic evaluation of the shaping ability of four instrumentation systems in curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2019; 52 (6): 908–16.
50. Kaisarly D, Gezawi M El. Polymerization shrinkage assessment of dental resin composites: a literature review. Odontology. 2016; 104 (3): 257–70.
51. Rizzante FAP, Sedky RAF, Furuse AY, Teich S, Ishikiriama SK, Mendonça G. Validation of a method of quantifying 3D leakage in dental restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2020; 123 (6): 839–44.
52. Carrera C. A., Lan C., Escobar-Sanabria D., Li Y., Rudney J., Aparicio C. FA. The Use of Micro-CT with Image Segmentation to Quantify Leakage in Dental Restorations. Dent Mater. 2015; 31 (4): 382–90.
53. Huang Y, Celikten B, De Faria Vasconcelos K, Nicolielo LFP, Lippiatt N, Buyuksungur A, et al. Micro-CT and nano-CT analysis of filling quality of three different endodontic sealers. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol. 2017; 46 (8).
54. Sridhara KS, Mankar S, Jayshankar CM, Vinaya K. Scanning electron microscopic study of teeth restored with fiber posts and composite resin: An in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2014; 6 (SUPPL. 1): 74–80.
55. Coutinho E, Cardoso M V., Fernandes CP, Neves AA, Gouvea C V.D., Van Landuyt KL, et al. Nanoleakage distribution at adhesive-dentin interfaces in 3D. J Dent Res. 2011; 90 (8): 1019–25.
56. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94 (4):
321–9.
57. Pegoretti A, Fambri L, Zappini G, Bianchetti M. Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post. Biomaterials. 2002; 23 (13): 2667–82.
58. Zicari F, Coutinho E, Scotti R, Van Meerbeek B, Naert I. Mechanical properties and micro-morphology of fiber posts. Dent Mater. 2013; 29 (4): e45–52.
59. Goracci C, Ferrari M. Current perspectives on post systems: A literature review. Aust Dent J. 2011; 56 (SUPPL. 1): 77–83.
60. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Fatigue resistance and structural characteristics of fiber posts: Three-point bending test and SEM evaluation. Dent Mater. 2005; 21 (2): 75–82.
61. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Monoblocks in Root Canals: A Hypothetical or a Tangible Goal. J Endod. 2007; 33 (4): 391–8.
62. Shalini Singh, Muqthadir Siddiqui Mohammed Abdul, Utsav Sharma , Shan Sainudeen, Chayan Jain JTK. Nickel Titanium Rotary Instruments: Development of the Single‑File Systems. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2017; 8 (5): 71–81.
63. Elnaghy A, Elsaka S. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography. Indian J Dent Res. 2016; 27 (1):
37–41.
64. Nishad, Sonalkumari; Shivamurthy G. Comparative Analysis of Apical Root Crack Propagation after Root Canal Preparation at Different Instrumentation Lengths Using ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next and ProTaper Gold Rotary Files: An In vitro Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018; 9 (1): S33–8.
65. Siqueira JF, Rôças IN. Clinical Implications and Microbiology of Bacterial Persistence after Treatment Procedures. J Endod. 2008; 34 (11).
66. Virdee SS, Farnell DJJ, Silva MA, Camilleri J, Cooper PR, Tomson PL. The influence of irrigant activation, concentration and contact time on sodium hypochlorite penetration into root dentine: an ex vivo experiment. Int Endod J. 2020; 53 (7): 986–97.
67. Duque JA, Duarte MAH, Canali LCF, Zancan RF, Vivan RR, Bernardes RA, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of New Mechanical Irrigant Agitating Devices for
Debris Removal from the Canal and Isthmus of Mesial Roots of Mandibular Molars. J Endod. 2017; 43 (2): 326–31.
68. Hartmann RC, Peters OA, de Figueiredo JAP, Rossi-Fedele G. Association of manual or engine-driven glide path preparation with canal centring and apical transportation: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2018; 51 (11): 1239–52.
69. Abu-Tahun IH, Kwak SW, Ha JH, Sigurdsson A, Kayahan MB, Kim HC. Effective establishment of glide-path to reduce torsional stress during nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation. Materials (Basel). 2019; 12 (3): 1–7.
70. Pasqualini D, Mollo L, Scotti N, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Migliaretti G, et al. Postoperative pain after manual and mechanical glide path: A Randomized clinical trial. J Endod [Internet]. 2012; 38 (1): 32–6.
71. Reoyo-Rodriguez M., García-Barbero A. E., Vera-González V. Influencia del tipo de acondicionamiento de la dentina en el cementado de postes de fibra: estudio mecanico, morfologico y de microfiltracion. Tesis doctoral. Madrid. Fac de Odontologia UCM. 2018