Publication: El diputado conseguidor: representación política particularista en el Congreso de la República Dominicana (1998-2010)
Loading...
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2017-07
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Asociación Española de Ciencia Política y de la Administración
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Este trabajo propone una clasificación del nivel de inclusividad de las proposiciones de ley para conocer cuál ha sido papel del Poder Legislativo en el arraigo o declive de la responsividad particular en la República Dominicana en el periodo 1998-2010, identificando variables institucionales y partidistas que condicionan el peso de los asuntos del distrito en las labores de representación. Los datos estadísticos evidencian que la personalización y la selección estratégica han prevalecido sobre la generalidad y la abstracción del mandato, limitando la vocación universal de la política pública del Poder Legislativo.
This work proposes a classification of the degree of inclusiveness of law proposals to explore the role of the Dominican Legislative Power in the establishment or decline of particularistic responsiveness during the period from 1998 to 2010. It does so by identifying the institutional and party variables which influence the weight of district matters in the exercise of political representation. Statistical data shows that individualization and strategic selection prevail over the generality and abstraction of the mandate of representation, thus limiting the universal orientation of the public policy by the Legislative power.
This work proposes a classification of the degree of inclusiveness of law proposals to explore the role of the Dominican Legislative Power in the establishment or decline of particularistic responsiveness during the period from 1998 to 2010. It does so by identifying the institutional and party variables which influence the weight of district matters in the exercise of political representation. Statistical data shows that individualization and strategic selection prevail over the generality and abstraction of the mandate of representation, thus limiting the universal orientation of the public policy by the Legislative power.