Publication: Libertad, relacionalidad y naturaleza de la persona : un diálogo desde Robert Spaemann con el construccionismo social
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2022-03-02
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Bajo el título «Libertad, relacionalidad y naturaleza de la persona. Un diálogo desde Robert Spaemann con el construccionismo social», este trabajo plantea un diálogo interdisciplinar entre las aportaciones del filósofo alemán contemporáneo Robert Spaemann y el construccionismo social, en torno a la libertad y la naturaleza de la persona. Nuestro objetivo ha sido abordar los retos y las contradicciones que plantea la dialéctica moderna entre naturaleza y libertad, presente en el construccionismo social, en relación a la persona y a la fundamentación de la vida en común. Lo hemos hecho mediante una discusión propia de los temas abordados, a partir de las contribuciones del filósofo alemán. La pregunta por la consideración de la naturaleza del ser humano y la libertad enla obra de dos autores paradigmáticos del construccionismo social en la segunda mitad del siglo XX —Peter Berger y Michel Foucault—, constituye el punto de partida de esta investigación. Mientras que el construccionismo social débil de Berger reduce la naturaleza a un sustrato biológico meramente inicial, pero carente de significado, el construccionismo social fuerte de signo foucaultiano da paso a una negación mucho más radical de la misma, sustrayéndole toda validez en el ámbito de lo humano y haciendo de ella un mero producto histórico. La consideración de la libertad en el marco de los autores construccionistas abordados se plantea en términos emancipatorios, ya sea como liberación de los roles construídos y asignados por la sociedad, o como liberación frente a las formas de individualidad impuestas...
Under the title “Freedom, relationality and nature of the human person. A dialogue between Robert Spaemann and social constructionism”, this work proposes an interdisciplinary dialogue between the German philosopher Robert Spaemann and social constructionism, on the nature and freedom of the human person. Our aim has been to address the challenges and contradictions posed by the modern dialectic between nature and freedom, as manifested in social constructionism, in relation to the person and the foundations of communal life. We have done so by proposing our own discussion of the issues addressed, based on the contributions of the German philosopher.The question of freedom and the nature of the human being within the framework of two paradigmatic authors of social constructionism in the second half of the 20th century — Peter Berger and Michel Foucault — constitutes the starting point of this research. While Berger's weak social constructionism reduces nature to a merely initial, but meaningless, biological substratum, foucaultian strong social constructionism voices a much more radical negation of nature, for it removes all its validity in the human sphere and turns it into a mere historical product. The consideration of freedom in the framework of the constructionist authors addressed is posed in emancipatory terms, either as a liberation from the roles constructed and assigned by society, or as a liberation from imposed forms of individuality...
Under the title “Freedom, relationality and nature of the human person. A dialogue between Robert Spaemann and social constructionism”, this work proposes an interdisciplinary dialogue between the German philosopher Robert Spaemann and social constructionism, on the nature and freedom of the human person. Our aim has been to address the challenges and contradictions posed by the modern dialectic between nature and freedom, as manifested in social constructionism, in relation to the person and the foundations of communal life. We have done so by proposing our own discussion of the issues addressed, based on the contributions of the German philosopher.The question of freedom and the nature of the human being within the framework of two paradigmatic authors of social constructionism in the second half of the 20th century — Peter Berger and Michel Foucault — constitutes the starting point of this research. While Berger's weak social constructionism reduces nature to a merely initial, but meaningless, biological substratum, foucaultian strong social constructionism voices a much more radical negation of nature, for it removes all its validity in the human sphere and turns it into a mere historical product. The consideration of freedom in the framework of the constructionist authors addressed is posed in emancipatory terms, either as a liberation from the roles constructed and assigned by society, or as a liberation from imposed forms of individuality...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología, leída el 26-11-2021. Tesis retirada por expreso deseo de la autora.