Publication: La teoría de las relaciones internacionales en la encrucijada: entre el tercer y cuarto debate
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2019
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad de Comillas
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El tercer debate teórico en las relaciones internacionales entre los positivistas, especialmente los neorrealistas, y los autores críticos postpositivistas, trató de ser superado por el constructivismo. Sin embargo, en este debate se ignoraron las aportaciones de la corriente científica y del internacionalismo sociológico, que han demostrado un mayor rigor metodológico y amplitud explicativa de los temas dominantes en la sociedad internacional. Por ese motivo se plantea la necesidad de abrir el cuarto debate para lograr que esta ciencia siga siendo progresiva evitando así el riesgo de su irrelevancia a largo plazo.
The third theoretical debate in international relations among the positivists, especially the neo-realists, and the critical post-positivist authors, tried to be overcome by constructivism. However, in this debate the contributions of the scientific program and sociological internationalism were ignored, which have demonstrated a greater methodological rigor and an explanatory breadth of the dominant themes in international society. For this reason, the need arises to open the fourth debate to ensure that this science continues to be progressive, thus avoiding the risk of its irrelevance in the long term.
The third theoretical debate in international relations among the positivists, especially the neo-realists, and the critical post-positivist authors, tried to be overcome by constructivism. However, in this debate the contributions of the scientific program and sociological internationalism were ignored, which have demonstrated a greater methodological rigor and an explanatory breadth of the dominant themes in international society. For this reason, the need arises to open the fourth debate to ensure that this science continues to be progressive, thus avoiding the risk of its irrelevance in the long term.