Publication: Construyendo y destruyendo un sueño: el estalinismo en la periferia nórdica (1928-1938)
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2022-09-06
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El objetivo fundamental de esta tesis doctoral es realizar una historia del estalinismo desde la periferia. Se investiga el caso particular de la República Socialista Soviética Autónoma de Carelia, una región con un estatus especial durante el periodo soviético de entreguerras. En cuanto al marco cronológico, el inicio se remonta al momento de las transformaciones radicales del país a finales de los años veinte y concluye con el fin de la represión en masa en 1938. Durante este periodo Carelia desarrolló características únicas dentro la dictadura de Stalin, como, por ejemplo, un inicio más temprano de la represión.Para conocer esta peculiaridad de la periferia nórdica, el estudio comienza con el mito político de la construcción del socialismo, un elemento clave para poder entender el desarrollo de los acontecimientos en la segunda mitad de la década de los treinta. Este factor ideológico es indispensable para comprender el estallido de la represión en masa y superar las limitaciones de algunas de las tendencias historiográficas más populares de los últimos años. Por otro lado, la tesis también realiza una radiografía del propio sistema. Sus lógicas, sus contradicciones y su forma de ejercer el poder son otros de los factores que hay que tener en cuenta para poder explicar uno de los episodios más represivos de la historia contemporánea.
The main purpose of this dissertation is to conduct a history of Stalinism from a peripheral perspective The unique case of the Karelian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Autonomous Republic, a region with a particular status during the Soviet interwar period, is the focus of the research. Regarding the chronological framework, the beginning dates back to the time of radical transformations in the late 1920s and concludes with the end of mass repression in 1938. During this period Karelia developed peculiar features unique within Stalin's dictatorship, such as, for example, an earlier outbreak of repression. In order to understand these particular features of the Nordic periphery, the study begins with the political myth of the "construction of socialism", a central element in the understanding of the outcome of events in the second half of the 1930s. This ideological factor is indispensable for understanding the outbreak of mass repression and overcoming the limitations of some of the most popular historiographical trends of recent years. This ideological factor is indispensable for a proper understanding of the outbreak of mass repression and for transcending the limitations of some of the most popular historiographical trends of recent years. On the other hand, the dissertation also makes an exposition of the system itself. Its logic, its paradoxes and its way of exercising power are other factors that must be considered to explain one of the most repressive episodes of contemporary history.
The main purpose of this dissertation is to conduct a history of Stalinism from a peripheral perspective The unique case of the Karelian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Autonomous Republic, a region with a particular status during the Soviet interwar period, is the focus of the research. Regarding the chronological framework, the beginning dates back to the time of radical transformations in the late 1920s and concludes with the end of mass repression in 1938. During this period Karelia developed peculiar features unique within Stalin's dictatorship, such as, for example, an earlier outbreak of repression. In order to understand these particular features of the Nordic periphery, the study begins with the political myth of the "construction of socialism", a central element in the understanding of the outcome of events in the second half of the 1930s. This ideological factor is indispensable for understanding the outbreak of mass repression and overcoming the limitations of some of the most popular historiographical trends of recent years. This ideological factor is indispensable for a proper understanding of the outbreak of mass repression and for transcending the limitations of some of the most popular historiographical trends of recent years. On the other hand, the dissertation also makes an exposition of the system itself. Its logic, its paradoxes and its way of exercising power are other factors that must be considered to explain one of the most repressive episodes of contemporary history.
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Geografía e Historia, leída el 06-06-2022