Publication: Estudio comparativo de férulas oclusales confeccionadas con tecnología Cad-Cam frente a férulas fabricadas por método convencional en pacientes con trastornos temporomandibulares
Loading...
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2021
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
El objetivo de este estudio transversal analítico fue comparar el comportamiento clínico entre férulas de estabilización confeccionadas mediante sistema CADCAM y férulas fabricadas convencionalmente en pacientes diagnosticados con algún trastorno temporomandibular según criterios DC/TMD (Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders) que acudieron a la clínica de Trastornos Temporomandibulares y Dolor Orofacial de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid durante el año 2021. La muestra fue de 6 pacientes (12 férulas) y fue obtenida mediante un muestreo no probabilístico de casos consecutivos. Se analizaron variables como la retención, estabilidad, báscula, puntos de contacto y guías, las características físicas, percepción de comodidad, tiempo de ajuste de ambos tipos de férula, así como el índice de asimetría muscular generada por ellas.
Los resultados preliminares de este estudio mostraron que no existen diferencias en cuanto a las características de confección ni el comportamiento clínico entre ambos tipos de férula. Resultados con una muestra mayor permitirán mejorar el nivel de evidencia en cuanto a determinar diferencias y similitudes entre estas férulas de estabilización, ayudando al clínico en la toma de decisiones sobre el método de confección más apropiado.
The objective of this cross-sectional analytic study was to make a comparison of the clinical behaviour among CAD-CAM and acrylic conventional stabilization splints in patients that have been diagnosed with a temporomandibular disorder according to DC/TMD criteria(Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders)in the Clinic of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain at Complutense University of Madrid during year 2021. The size sample was 6 patients (12 stabilization splints) which was obtained through a consecutive nonprobability sampling. Variables such as retention, stability, bascule, occlusal contacts, anterior and lateral guidance, physical traits, comfort perception, and clinical adjusting time of both types of splints as well as asymmetry index of masticatory muscles were analysed. The preliminary outcomes indicated absence of differences in terms of physical and mechanical traits and the clinical behaviour among both types of splints. Increasing the number of participants will allow to improve the level of evidence in terms of determining the differences of traits of these two stabilization splints helping the clinicians in the decision making about the most suitable manufacturing method.
The objective of this cross-sectional analytic study was to make a comparison of the clinical behaviour among CAD-CAM and acrylic conventional stabilization splints in patients that have been diagnosed with a temporomandibular disorder according to DC/TMD criteria(Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders)in the Clinic of Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain at Complutense University of Madrid during year 2021. The size sample was 6 patients (12 stabilization splints) which was obtained through a consecutive nonprobability sampling. Variables such as retention, stability, bascule, occlusal contacts, anterior and lateral guidance, physical traits, comfort perception, and clinical adjusting time of both types of splints as well as asymmetry index of masticatory muscles were analysed. The preliminary outcomes indicated absence of differences in terms of physical and mechanical traits and the clinical behaviour among both types of splints. Increasing the number of participants will allow to improve the level of evidence in terms of determining the differences of traits of these two stabilization splints helping the clinicians in the decision making about the most suitable manufacturing method.
Description
UCM subjects
Unesco subjects
Keywords
Citation
Greene CS. Managing the Care of Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. septiembre de 2010;141(9):1086-8.
2. Costen JB. A Syndrome of Ear and Sinus Symptoms Dependent upon Disturbed Function of the Temporomandibular Joint. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. octubre de 1997;106(10):805-19.
3. Durham J, Newton-John TRO, Zakrzewska JM. Temporomandibular disorders. BMJ. 12 de marzo de 2015;350(mar12 9):h1154-h1154.
4. Greene C, Manfredini D. Treating Temporomandibular Disorders in the 21st Century: Can We Finally Eliminate the “Third Pathway”? J Oral Facial Pain Headache. julio de
2020;34(3):206-16.
5. Fillingim RB, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, Knott C, Diatchenko L, Dubner R, et al. Psychological Factors Associated With Development of TMD: The OPPERA Prospective
Cohort Study. J Pain. diciembre de 2013;14(12):T75-90.
6. de Leeuw R, Klasser G. Orofacial Pain: Guidelines for Assesment, Diagnosis, and Management. Sixth edition. Hannover Park, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co; 2018. 327 p.
7. Turner JA, Dworkin SF, Mancl L, Huggins KH, Truelove EL. The roles of beliefs, catastrophizing, and coping in the functioning of patients with temporomandibular
disorders. Pain. mayo de 2001;92(1):41-51.
8. Jones DA, Rollman GB, Brooke RI. The cortisol response to psychological stress in temporomandibular dysfunction: Pain. agosto de 1997;72(1):171-82.
9. Manfredini D, Guarda-Nardini L, Winocur E, Piccotti F, Ahlberg J, Lobbezoo F. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of axis I
epidemiologic findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. octubre de 2011;112(4):453-62.
10. Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet J-P, et al. Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD) for Clinical and Research
Applications: Recommendations of the International RDC/TMD Consortium Network* and Orofacial Pain Special Interest Group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. enero de
2014;28(1):6-27.
11. Serrano-Hernanz G, Kothari S, Castrillón E, Álvarez-Méndez A, Ardizone-García I, Svensson P. Importance of Standardized Palpation of the Human Temporomandibular
Joint. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. abril de 2019;33(2):220-6.
12. Peck CC, Goulet J-P, Lobbezoo F, Schiffman EL, Alstergren P, Anderson GC, et al. Expanding the taxonomy of the diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders. J
Oral Rehabil. enero de 2014;41(1):2-23.
13. Noma N, Watanabe Y, Shimada A, Usuda S, Iida T, Shimada A, et al. Effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on orofacial pain conditions. J Oral Sci. 2021;63(1):4-7.
14. de Melo L, de Medeiros A, Campos M, de Resende C, Barbosa G, de Almeida E. Manual Therapy in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Related to Temporomandibular Disorders: A
Systematic Review. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. abril de 2020;34(2):141-8.
15. Machado D, Martimbianco ALC, Bussadori SK, Pacheco RL, Riera R, Santos EM. Botulinum Toxin Type A for Painful Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and
MetaAnalysis. J Pain. marzo de 2020;21(3-4):281-93.
16. Mujakperuo HR, Watson M, Morrison R, Macfarlane TV. Pharmacological interventions
for pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders. Cochrane Oral Health Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 6 de octubre de 2010 [citado 14 de agosto
de 2021]; Disponible en: https://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD004715.pub2
17. Al-Moraissi EA, Farea R, Qasem KA, Al-Wadeai MS, Al-Sabahi ME, Al-Iryani GM. Effectiveness of occlusal splint therapy in the management of temporomandibular
disorders: network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. agosto de 2020;49(8):1042-56.
18. Al-Moraissi EA, Wolford LM, Ellis E, Neff A. The hierarchy of different treatments for arthrogenous temporomandibular disorders: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. enero de 2020;48(1):9-23.
19. Nagata K, Maruyama H, Mizuhashi R, Morita S, Hori S, Yokoe T, et al. Efficacy of stabilisation splint therapy combined with non-splint multimodal therapy for treating
RDC / TMD axis I patients: a randomised controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil. diciembre de 2015;42(12):890-9.
20. Manfredini D, Colonna A, Bracci A, Lobbezoo F. Bruxism: a summary of current knowledge on aetiology, assessment and management. Oral Surg. noviembre de 2020;13(4):358-70.
21. Zhang S-H, He K-X, Lin C-J, Liu X-D, Wu L, Chen J, et al. Efficacy of occlusal splints in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acta Odontol Scand. 16 de noviembre de 2020;78(8):580-9.
22. Kuzmanovic Pficer J, Dodic S, Lazic V, Trajkovic G, Milic N, Milicic B. Occlusal stabilization splint for patients with temporomandibular disorders: Meta-analysis of short and long term effects. Milgrom PM, editor. PLOS ONE. 6 de febrero de 2017;12(2):e0171296.
23. Noguchi T, Kashiwagi K, Fukuda K. The effectiveness of stabilization appliance therapy among patients with myalgia. Clin Exp Dent Res. abril de 2020;6(2):244-53.
24. Ramfjord SP, Ash MM. Reflections on the Michigan occlusal splint. J Oral Rehabil. septiembre de 1994;21(5):491-500.
25. Dedem P. Digital Michigan splint – from intraoral scanning to plasterless manufacturing Die digitale Michigan-Schiene – Vom intraoralen Scan zur gipsfreien Herstellung. Int J Comput Dent. :15.
26. Greene CS, Menchel HF. The Use of Oral Appliances in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. agosto de 2018;30(3):265-77.
27. Klasser GD, Greene CS. Oral appliances in the management of temporomandibular disorders. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. febrero de
2009;107(2):212-23.
28. Romero Cabosmalon N. Estudio Experimental de la Respuesta Neuromuscular con Férula de Estabilización en Pacientes con Trastornos Temporomandibulares y Bruxismo [Tesis Doctoral]. [Madrid, España]: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2016.
29. Benli M. Surface roughness and wear behavior of occlusal splint materials made of contemporary and high-performance polymers. :11.
30. Steinmassl P-A, Wiedemair V, Huck C, Klaunzer F, Steinmassl O, Grunert I, et al. Do CAD/CAM dentures really release les monomer than conventional dentures? Clin Oral
Investig. junio de 2017;21(5):1697-705.
31. Zafar MS. Prosthodontic Applications of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA): An Update. Polymers. 8 de octubre de 2020;12(10):2299.
32. Srinivasan M, Gjengedal H, Cattani-Lorente M, Moussa M, Durual S, Schimmel M, et al. CAD/CAM milled complete removable dental prostheses: An in vitro evaluation of
biocompatibility, mechanical properties, and surface roughness. Dent Mater J. 26 de julio de 2018;37(4):526-33.
33. Wang S, Li Z, Ye H, Zhao W, Liu Y, Zhou Y. Preliminary clinical evaluation of traditional and a new digital PEEK occlusal splints for the management of sleep bruxism. J Oral Rehabil. 28 de octubre de 2020;joor.13083.
34. Murat S, Alp G, Alatalı C, Uzun M. In Vitro Evaluation of Adhesion of Candida albicans on CAD/CAM PMMA-Based Polymers: Adhesion of C. albicans on CAD/CAM PMMA-Based
Polymers. J Prosthodont. febrero de 2019;28(2):e873-9.
35. Berli C, Thieringer FM, Sharma N, Müller JA, Dedem P, Fischer J, et al. Comparing the mechanical properties of pressed, milled, and 3D-printed resins for occlusal devices. J Prosthet Dent. diciembre de 2020;124(6):780-6.
36. Grymak A, Aarts JM, Ma S, Waddell JN, Choi JJE. Comparison of hardness and polishability of various occlusal splint materials. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. marzo de
2021;115:104270.
37. Salmi M, Paloheimo K-S, Tuomi J, Ingman T, Makitie A. A digital process for additive manufacturing of occlusal splints: a clinical pilot study. :6.
38. Stephen P. Warunek, Lauren M. Computer-based fabrication of occlusal splints for treatment of bruxism and TMD. Journal of clinical orthodontics. mayo de 2008;42:22732.
39. Ye N, Wu T, Dong T, Yuan L, Fang B, Xia L. Precision of 3D-printed splints with different dental model offsets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. mayo de 2019;155(5):733-8.
40. Lauren M, McIntyre F. A new computer-assisted method for design and fabrication of occlusal splints. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. abril de 2008;133(4):S130-5.
41. Pita MS, Ribeiro AB, Garcia AR, Pedrazzi V, Zuim PRJ. Effect of occlusal splint thickness on electrical masticatory muscle activity during rest and clenching. Braz Oral Res. diciembre de 2011;25(6):506-11.
42. Moreno-Hay I, Okeson JP. Does altering the occlusal vertical dimension produce temporomandibular disorders? A literature review. J Oral Rehabil. noviembre de
2015;42(11):875-82.
43. Kandasamy S, Greene C. An evidence-based evaluation of the concept of centric relation in the 21st century. Quintessence Int. 14 de septiembre de 2018;49(9):755-60.
44. Barnes MF, Geary JL, Clifford TJ, Lamey P-J. Fitting acrylic occlusal splints and an experimental laminated appliance used in migraine prevention therapy. Br Dent J. marzo de 2006;200(5):283-6.
45. Lukic N, Saxer T, Hou M, Zumbrunn Wojczyńska A, Gallo LM, Colombo V. Short‐term effects of NTI-tss and Michigan splint on nocturnal jaw muscle activity: A pilot study. Clin
Exp Dent Res. junio de 2021;7(3):323-30.
46. Berntsen C, Kleven M, Heian M, Hjortsjö C. Clinical comparison of conventional and additive manufactured stabilization splints. Acta Biomater Odontol Scand. 1 de enero de 2018;4(1):81-9.
47. Aneiros López F. Estudio de la asimetría muscular en disfunción cráneomandibular mediante registros electromiográficos [Tesis Doctoral]. [Madrid, España]: Universidad Complutense de Madrid; 2012.
48. McCARROLL RS, Naeije M, Kim YK, Hansson TL. Short-term effect of a stabilization splint on the asymmetry of submaximal masticatory muscle activity. J Oral Rehabil. marzo de 1989;16(2):171-6.
49. Abekura H, Kotani H, Tokuyama H, Hamada T. Effects of occlusal splints on the asymmetry of masticatory muscle activity during maximal clenching. J Oral Rehabil.
octubre de 1995;22(10):747-52.