Publication: Sustainability oriented innovation and organizational values: a cluster analysis
No Thumbnail Available
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Purpose
Sustainability is an important priority for CEOs according to a recent Mckinsey (2021) survey. However, despite growing pressure from capital investors, employees and consumers, few organizations are satisfied with the sustainability objectives achieved beyond objectives related to economic savings.
The sustainability challenge is even more difficult for organizations when dealing with designing their innovation portfolio strategies since the markets´ demands and competitors´ strategies may contradict organizations’ sustainability objectives and thus jeopardize their continuity. Some researchers argue that a commitment to sustainability in organizations is not so much a matter of managerial practice but rather is rooted in organizational values (Globocnik et al., 2020). Therefore, this research aims to explore what types of organizational values more effectively promote sustainability-oriented innovation in organizations. Using as a conceptual framework the competing values theory (Quinn & Rohrbaugh, 1983), and adding one dimension, risk aversion, we empirically define some clusters of business typologies from which we derive patterns of value profiles. We show how these clusters’ patterns of values relate to the success of a firm’s sustainability-oriented innovation.
Methodology
To make sense of our literature review and ensure managerial relevance, we surveyed 128 senior managers from different industries and countries to understand how their perceived organizational values may impact their firms’ sustainability-oriented innovation success. As a result, we group the studied organizations into four clusters according to the informed organizational values, and we assess how the different clusters are more or less prone to succeed with a sustainability-oriented innovation strategy.
Findings
Our results show that not all organizational values contribute equally to the success of sustainability-oriented innovation in the market. As a theoretical contribution, we advance current knowledge about how organizational values may impact sustainability-oriented innovation success by providing a framework to measure and follow up on the evolution of necessary organizational values to embrace sustainability-oriented innovation within an organization. From a managerial perspective, we advance knowledge on how organizational values should evolve and change to efficiently deliver more sustainability-oriented innovation. In addition, we describe specific values that organizations should measure and track and otherwise establish as an important first step toward implementing sustainability-oriented innovation within them.
Originality
Our research provides original results by expanding current knowledge on organizational values to better understand which values more efficiently promote competitive sustainability-oriented innovation in organizations. We expand the four organizational cultural archetypes of organizational values to develop a more flexible and actionable framework of five dimensions by adding an important dimension to the model, risk aversion. Together, these dimensions generate new insights through a cluster analysis of organizational differences and inform priorities and courses of actions to undertake.
Description
UCM subjects
Keywords
Citation
Abbas, J., Zhang, Q., Hussain, I., Akram, S., Afaq, A., & Shad, M. A. (2020). Sustainable innovation in
small medium enterprises: the impact of knowledge management on organizational innovation through
a mediation analysis by using SEM approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 2407.
Adams, R., Bessant, J., Jeanrenaud, S., Overy, P., & Denyer, D. (2012). Innovating for sustainability: a systematic review of the body of knowledge. Network for Business Sustainability.
Adams, R., Jeanrenaud, S., Bessant, J., Denyer, D., & Overy, P. (2016). Sustainability-oriented innovation: A
systematic review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 18(2), 180–205.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for
creativity. Academy of management journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational
behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainability development. Strategic management journal, 26(3), 197–218.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck, and business strategy. Management science, 32(10), 1231–1241.
Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2013). Are firms with different CSR profiles equally
innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data. European Management Journal, 31(6), 642–654.
Boons, F., Montalvo, C., Quist, J., & Wagner, M. (2013). Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. Journal of cleaner production, 45, 1–8.
Boothby, D., Dufour, A., & Tang, J. (2010). Technology adoption, training and productivity performance.
Research Policy, 39(5), 650–661.
Bos-Brouwers, H. E. J. (2010). Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: Evidence of themes and
activities in practice. Business strategy and the environment, 19(7), 417–435.
Buenger, V., Daft, R. L., Conlon, E. J., & Austin, J. (1996). Competing values in organizations: Contextual
influences and structural consequences. Organization Science, 7(5), 557–576.
Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. B. (2013). Organizational culture and innovation: A meta-analytic
review. Journal of product innovation management, 30(4), 763–781.
Carayannis, E. G., Sindakis, S., & Walter, C. (2015). Business model innovation as lever of organizational
sustainability. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 85–104.
Charter, M., Gray, C., Clark, T., & Woolman, T. (2017). The role of business in realising sustainable consumption and production. System Innovation for Sustainability 1 (pp. 56–79). Routledge.
Chesbrough, H. (2007). Business model innovation: it’s not just about technology anymore. Strategy &
leadership, 35(6), 12–17
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence,
and family–centered non–economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 36(2),
267–293.
De Marchi, V. (2012). Environmental innovation and R&D cooperation: Empirical evidence from Spanish
manufacturing firms. Research policy, 41(3), 614–623.
Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A
native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. Academy of management review, 21(3), 619–654.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: Introducing Statistical Method (3rd ed.). Thousand
Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Florea, L., Cheung, Y. H., & Herndon, N. C. (2013). For all good reasons: Role of values in organizational
sustainability. Journal of business ethics, 114(3), 393–408.
Gallouj, F., & Savona, M. (2009). Innovation in Services: A Review of the Debate and a Research Agenda.
Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 19(2), 149–172.
Gehman, J., Trevino, L. K., & Garud, R. (2013). Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of management Journal, 56(1), 84–112.
Globocnik, D., Faullant, R., & Parastuty, Z. (2020). Bridging strategic planning and business model management–A formal control framework to manage business model portfolios and dynamics. European
Management Journal, 38(2), 231–243.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Badin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Ronald, L. T. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Hansen, E. G., & Grosse-Dunker, F. (2013). Sustainability-Oriented Innovation. In S. O. Idowu, N. Capaldi,
L. Zu, & A. Das Gupta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility (1( vol., pp. 2407–
2417). Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hansen, E. G., Grosse-Dunker, F., & Reichwald, R. (2009). Sustainability innovation cube—a framework to
evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(04),
683–713.
Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Perspectives,
17(2), 56–67.
Hellström, T. (2007). Dimensions of environmentally sustainable innovation: the structure of eco-innovation
concepts. Sustainable development, 15(3), 148–159.
Jaworski, B. J., Stathakopoulos, V., & Krishnan, H. S. (1993). Control combinations in marketing: conceptual
framework and empirical evidence. Journal of marketing, 57(1), 57–69.
Ketchen, D. J., & Shook, C. L. (1996). The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research:
An analysis and critique. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 441–459.
Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of cleaner production, 65, 57–75.
Kristiansen, J. N., & Ritala, P. (2018). “Measuring radical innovation project success: typical metrics don’t
work”. Journal of Business Strategy, 39 No(4), 34–41.
Lehman, D. R. (1979). Market research and analysis. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Linnenluecke, M. K., & Griffiths, A. (2010). Corporate sustainability and organizational culture. Journal of
world business, 45(4), 357–366.
Mainemelis, C. (2010). Stealing fire: Creative deviance in the evolution of new ideas. Academy of management review, 35(4), 558–578.
Málovics, G., Csigéné, N. N., & Kraus, S. (2008). The role of corporate social responsibility in strong sustainability. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(3), 907–918.
Martínez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its
effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2374–2383.
McKinsey (2021). How companies capture the value of sustainability: Survey findings. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/sustainability/ourinsights/
how-companies-capture-the-value-of-sustainability-survey-findings.
Meroño-Cerdán, A. L., López-Nicolás, C., & Molina-Castillo, F. J. (2018). Risk aversion, innovation and
performance in family firms. Economics of Innovation and new technology, 27(2), 189–203.
Morrar, R. (2014). Innovation in services: A literature review.Technology Innovation Management Review,
4(4).
Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1982). Moving beyond the single-solution perspective: The competing
values approach as a diagnostic tool. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 18(4), 463–472.
Quinn, R. E., & McGrath, M. R. (1985). The transformation of organizational cultures: A competing values
perspective.
Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values
approach to organizational analysis. Management science, 29(3), 363–377.
Rennings, K., & Zwick, T. (2002). Employment impact of cleaner production on the firm level: Empirical
evidence from a survey in five European countries. International Journal of Innovation Management,
6(03), 319–342.
Rennings, K., Ziegler, A., Ankele, K., & Hoffmann, E. (2006). The influence of different characteristics of
the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and
economic performance. Ecological Economics, 57(1), 45–59.
Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation—eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological
economics. Ecological economics, 32(2), 319–332.
Reyes-Santiago, M. D. R., & Díaz-Pichardo, R. (2017). “Eco-innovation and organizational culture in the
hotel industry.“ International Journal of Hospitality Management 65 (2017): 71–80.
Roome, N. (1994). Business strategy, R&D management and environmental imperatives. R&D Management,
24(1), 065–082.
Saltzman, O., Ionescue-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability:
literature review and research option. European Management Journal, 23, 2–36.
Saura, J. R., Palacios-Marqués, D., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2022a). Exploring the boundaries of open innovation: Evidence from social media mining.Technovation,102447.
Saura, J. R., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2022b). Adopting digital reservation systems to
enable circular economy in entrepreneurship. Management Decision. (ahead-of-print).
Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: categories
and interactions. Business strategy and the environment, 20(4), 222–237.
Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: the role of
business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International journal of innovation and sustainable development, 6(2), 95–119.
Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of
competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic management journal, 19(8), 729–753.
Siebenhüner, B., & Arnold, M. (2007). Organizational learning to manage sustainable development. Business
strategy and the environment, 16(5), 339–353.
Stubbs, W., & Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a “sustainability business model”. Organization & environment, 21(2), 103–127.
Sullivan, W., Sullivan, R., & Buffton, B. (2001). Aligning individual and organisational values to support
change. Journal of Change Management, 2(3), 247–254.
Torugsa, N. A., O’Donohue, W., & Hecker, R. (2012). Capabilities, proactive CSR and financial performance
in SMEs: Empirical evidence from an Australian manufacturing industry sector. Journal of business
ethics, 109(4), 483–500.
Tsur, Y., Sternberg, M., & Hochman, E. (1990). Dynamic modelling of innovation process adoption with risk
aversion and learning. Oxford Economic Papers, 42(2), 336–355.
Zheng, Q., Guo, W., An, W., Wang, L., & Liang, R. (2017). Factors facilitating user projects success in coinnovation communities. Kybernetes, 47(4), 656–671.
Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliatio