Publication: La responsabilidad solidaria de los agentes de la edificación. Sus efectos en la prescripción, la intervención provocada y el derecho de repetición
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2020-02-17
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Antes de la entrada en vigor de la Ley de Ordenación de la Edificación (LOE), la jurisprudencia —al amparo del artículo 1.591 del Código Civil (CC)— imponía la condena solidaria a los agentes de la edificación en aquellos casos en los que no resultaba posible deslindar el grado de responsabilidad de cada agente en la producción del defecto constructivo: este tipo de solidaridad, no nacida ni de la ley ni del convenio, se denominó impropia o in solidum. A diferencia del artículo 1591 CC, la LOE sí regula de manera expresa en su artículo 17 la solidaridad de los agentes de la edificación en determinados supuestos, lo que lleva a plantearnos cuál es la naturaleza de dicha solidaridad —si propia o impropia— y los efectos que esta produce. Esta es la base partida de la presente tesis. Objetivos. Esta tesis tiene por objeto analizar la responsabilidad civil de los agentes de la edificación derivada de la LOE, en los casos en los que esta sea solidaria, con el fin de determinar sus efectos y consecuencias más relevantes en la prescripción, la intervención provocada y el derecho de repetición. Mi intención es que este trabajo resulte crítico, propositivo y de utilidad práctica...
Before the entry into force of the building regulation law LOE (Ley de Ordenación de la Edificación), jurisprudence —for years, and under cover of the Civil Code (CC) 1.591 article— imposed a solidary judgment to building agents in those cases in which do not result possible to determine or discriminate the degree of responsibility of each agent in the constructive defect: this type of solidarity, not arising from the law or the contract, was called improper or in solidum. Unlike the 1591 CC article, the LOE already regulates expressly in article 17 the building agents solidary judgment in certain cases, which leads us to ask what really is the nature of this solidarity —if proper or improper— and the effects that it produces. This is the baseline of this doctoral thesis. Objectives. The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the building agents civil liability, in cases in which it is solidary, in order to determine its effects and most relevant consequences on limitation, additional claims and contribution. My intention for this work is to be critical, propositive and of practical usefulness...
Before the entry into force of the building regulation law LOE (Ley de Ordenación de la Edificación), jurisprudence —for years, and under cover of the Civil Code (CC) 1.591 article— imposed a solidary judgment to building agents in those cases in which do not result possible to determine or discriminate the degree of responsibility of each agent in the constructive defect: this type of solidarity, not arising from the law or the contract, was called improper or in solidum. Unlike the 1591 CC article, the LOE already regulates expressly in article 17 the building agents solidary judgment in certain cases, which leads us to ask what really is the nature of this solidarity —if proper or improper— and the effects that it produces. This is the baseline of this doctoral thesis. Objectives. The purpose of this thesis is to analyze the building agents civil liability, in cases in which it is solidary, in order to determine its effects and most relevant consequences on limitation, additional claims and contribution. My intention for this work is to be critical, propositive and of practical usefulness...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Derecho, Departamento de Derecho Civil, leída el 25/10/2019. Tesis retirada por expreso deseo del autor.