Publication: La poesía de Ángel González: Segundo tiempo
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2016-10-26
Authors
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
Para la cita de los poemas de Ángel González hasta Nada grave he empleado la quinta impresión de su obra completa, Palabra sobre palabra, publicada por Seix Barral en enero de 2008. No obstante, también he trabajado directamente sobre primeras ediciones1 de Muestra de algunos procedimientos narrativos y de las actitudes sentimentales que habitualmente comportan; Muestra, corregida y aumentada, de algunos procedimientos narrativos y de las actitudes sentimentales que habitualmente comportan, y de Prosemas o menos, aunque la referencia final contemple en todos los casos las páginas que ocupan en la obra conjunta. En el comentario de Otoños y otras luces, además de su ya mencionada obra completa, he consultado un ejemplar editado por Tusquets en febrero de 2002 (4ª edición); y para la reseña de su póstumo Nada grave, la primera edición de la Colección Palabra de Honor, publicada por Visor en mayo de 2008, unos meses después de la muerte del poeta. Los poemas titulados por el autor se citan en letra redonda entre comillas angulares («...»); sin embargo, en los casos en los que la composición carece de epígrafe he empleado el primer verso escrito en cursiva enmarcado con comillas inglesas (“...”). El sistema de cita se ajusta a la norma ISO 690-I, haciendo constar entre paréntesis el apellido del autor, el año de edición, y si procede, la/s página/s (AUTOR, AÑO: N.º PÁG.). Las obras firmadas por varios autores se señalan mediante la abreviatura VV.AA. separada del año mediante una coma (VV.AA., AÑO: N.º PÁG.). Si el nombre del autor se encuentra en el texto próximo a la cita, solo se indica el año y la página...
Communication or knowledge, existentialism or compromise, social realism or criticism… Frequent dilemmas in studies of the work of Ángel González which approach specific aspects of his poetry. A man of his time, González linked his artistic development to historical and personal circumstances which were key to a constantly evolving poetry, but marked by a notable coherence in which his voice can be observed as one of the most authentic and precise of the literary scene of the mid-1950s. From then until his death in 2008 his work has encompassed a unique personal universe, which has generated not inconsiderable critical debate. As we shall see, the poet took an active personal role in some these debates, leaving behind a valuable legacy, shedding light on some of the more controversial questions regarding his work. A synchronous look at his work serves, as with any poet, to establish links with certain schools of thought which temper the diachronic plenitude of his work, something which logically occours when the artist disappears. As a result, it is possible to speak of a “committed” Ángel González, and a “defeated” Ángel González without contradiction as his work presents the reader with a wide variety of imagery in which nothing is how it seems, and, at the same time, everything is possible; a challenge which demands commitment in order to perceive not so much reality as to begin to see through the haze. His work explores many areas which trigger a reaction in the consciousness of the reader. On the other hand, this formality and conceptuality – particularly in the books which I will refer to in this study, is concealed behind a series of masks, transmitting the sensation of a dramatic monologue devoid of emotion and sentimentality in its literary discourse. When the author brings to life a character with the same name as him, and who lives in a similar house, the anecdotes reflect closely the real life of the author (GONZÁLEZ, 2008c: 12-14), the reader should not trust wholeheartedly in this ironic protagonist who invites us to consider a range of viewpoints...
Communication or knowledge, existentialism or compromise, social realism or criticism… Frequent dilemmas in studies of the work of Ángel González which approach specific aspects of his poetry. A man of his time, González linked his artistic development to historical and personal circumstances which were key to a constantly evolving poetry, but marked by a notable coherence in which his voice can be observed as one of the most authentic and precise of the literary scene of the mid-1950s. From then until his death in 2008 his work has encompassed a unique personal universe, which has generated not inconsiderable critical debate. As we shall see, the poet took an active personal role in some these debates, leaving behind a valuable legacy, shedding light on some of the more controversial questions regarding his work. A synchronous look at his work serves, as with any poet, to establish links with certain schools of thought which temper the diachronic plenitude of his work, something which logically occours when the artist disappears. As a result, it is possible to speak of a “committed” Ángel González, and a “defeated” Ángel González without contradiction as his work presents the reader with a wide variety of imagery in which nothing is how it seems, and, at the same time, everything is possible; a challenge which demands commitment in order to perceive not so much reality as to begin to see through the haze. His work explores many areas which trigger a reaction in the consciousness of the reader. On the other hand, this formality and conceptuality – particularly in the books which I will refer to in this study, is concealed behind a series of masks, transmitting the sensation of a dramatic monologue devoid of emotion and sentimentality in its literary discourse. When the author brings to life a character with the same name as him, and who lives in a similar house, the anecdotes reflect closely the real life of the author (GONZÁLEZ, 2008c: 12-14), the reader should not trust wholeheartedly in this ironic protagonist who invites us to consider a range of viewpoints...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Filología, Departamento de Filología Española II (Literatura Española), leída el 02-12-2015