Publication: La ejecución provisional de resoluciones judiciales en el proceso civil español
Loading...
Files
Official URL
Full text at PDC
Publication Date
2018-06-14
Advisors (or tutors)
Editors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Citations
Exportar
Abstract
La Ley de Enjuiciamiento Civil española, de 7 de enero de 2000 (LEC), admitió de forma general la ejecución provisional de resoluciones judiciales que contengan pronunciamientos de condena a favor de una de las partes, y sin necesidad de prestar caución para instar su despacho, excluyendo de forma excepcional y expresamente del ámbito objetivo de esta institución determinadas resoluciones. Esta opción de política legislativa significó un impulso de la ejecución provisional y una decidida confianza por la administración de justicia de primera instancia sin precedentes en el ordenamiento procesal civil español, y ha sido considerada como una de las principales novedades introducidas por la LEC. Para ello, el legislador partió de la base de que la ejecución de las resoluciones judiciales no depende de su firmeza, y no se opone a la Constitución la regulación legal de un régimen de ejecución provisional. Así, se implementa un sistema de ejecución provisional –entendida como una modalidad de la ejecución ordinaria o definitiva que confiere efectividad a las resoluciones judiciales no firmes que contienen pronunciamientos de condena y que han sido impugnadas, cuyos efectos se encuentran supeditados al resultado del recurso interpuesto frente a ella– que se caracteriza por realizar una regulación completa y unitaria de la institución, esto es, fijando una misma normativa aplicable tanto a la ejecución provisional de resoluciones de primera como de resoluciones de segunda instancia, que se encarga de establecer no sólo los requisitos y presupuestos para que opere este instituto, sino regulando un específico régimen de oposición como único mecanismo de defensa del ejecutado provisional frente a la ejecución previamente despachada y regulando los efectos de la confirmación y, especialmente, de la revocación del pronunciamiento provisionalmente ejecutado...
Spanish Law of Civil Procedure, of January 7, 2000 (LEC), admitted in general provisional enforcement of judgments containing declarations of condemnations in favor of one of the parties, and without need to provide bail or any other security, excluding exceptional and expressly from the scope of this institution aim certain judgments. This choice of legislative policy meant a provisional enforcement and a determined confidence boost for the administration of Justice of first instance unprecedented in the Spanish civil procedural law, and has been considered as one of the main innovations introduced by the LEC. Therefore the legislator left base that the enforcement of judgments does not depend on its firmness, and the legal regulation of a regime of provisional enforcement is not contrary to the Constitution. Thus, a system of provisional enforcement –understood as a form of enforcement giving effectiveness to no firm judgments containing statements of condemnation and which have been challenged, is implemented the effects are subject to the outcome of the appeal lodged against it– which is characterized by making a complete and unified regulation of the institution that is, setting a same legislation both provisional enforcement of first instance judgments and second instance judgments, which is in charge of establishing not only the requirements for operating this institute, but regulating a specific regime of opposition as the only mechanism for the defence of the provisional enforcement against the enforcement previously released and by regulating the effects of confirmation and especially the revocation of the provisionally executed statement...
Spanish Law of Civil Procedure, of January 7, 2000 (LEC), admitted in general provisional enforcement of judgments containing declarations of condemnations in favor of one of the parties, and without need to provide bail or any other security, excluding exceptional and expressly from the scope of this institution aim certain judgments. This choice of legislative policy meant a provisional enforcement and a determined confidence boost for the administration of Justice of first instance unprecedented in the Spanish civil procedural law, and has been considered as one of the main innovations introduced by the LEC. Therefore the legislator left base that the enforcement of judgments does not depend on its firmness, and the legal regulation of a regime of provisional enforcement is not contrary to the Constitution. Thus, a system of provisional enforcement –understood as a form of enforcement giving effectiveness to no firm judgments containing statements of condemnation and which have been challenged, is implemented the effects are subject to the outcome of the appeal lodged against it– which is characterized by making a complete and unified regulation of the institution that is, setting a same legislation both provisional enforcement of first instance judgments and second instance judgments, which is in charge of establishing not only the requirements for operating this institute, but regulating a specific regime of opposition as the only mechanism for the defence of the provisional enforcement against the enforcement previously released and by regulating the effects of confirmation and especially the revocation of the provisionally executed statement...
Description
Tesis inédita de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Derecho, Departamento de Derecho Procesal, leída el 29-06-2017